Seth Finkelstein wrote:
Andrew Gray
(This has caused much elaborate conspiracy theory in the past
revolving around nofollow and favoured Wikia links, etc)
Well, in defense of critics, I think it's important to
acknowledge that there are many aspects of the situation which
2009/6/26 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
Fine. So assume good faith is not the de facto standard on the
Internet. Assume convoluted conspiracy is closer to being the de
facto standard on some forums, to put it bluntly. The reason AGF is a
good idea for WP is that we have
2009/6/24 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
I was trying to follow the nofollow discussion
(http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Nofollow#Current_use_on_Wikimedia_projects).
I see it hinges on external links, and my question about it would be
concerning when an interwiki link to a
2009/6/24 Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk:
My understanding is that anything which goes to a URL - a one-bracket
link - gets treated as an external link and is nofollowed, regardless
of where it goes; anything created as a wikimarkup link, *including*
interwiki links, is treated as
, Jun 24, 2009 9:03 am
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Nofollow and sister projects
2009/6/24 Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk:
My understanding is that anything which goes to a URL - a one-bracket
link - gets treated as an external link and is nofollowed, regardless
of where it goes
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 14:59, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
Are links created by templates nofollowed or followed?
That is, someone creates a template like {{Brittanica|Edward VI}}
or whatever.
What's the follow treatment ?
The same as anything else: if the template creates a one-bracket link,
it
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Mark Wagner carni...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 14:59, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
Are links created by templates nofollowed or followed?
That is, someone creates a template like {{Brittanica|Edward VI}}
or whatever.
What's the follow treatment
