There is probably some truth in that. Most people who deal with online
identity have to deal with the online disinhibition effect (ODE), and
many of us have certain experience of expressing ourselves using
less-than-ideal concepts.
But that's no less true for the few partisans trying to turn the
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
It's coverage in the actual media rather than blogs isn't very
widespread. It is however cheap and easy to write so there is a
significant incentive for media organisations to pick it up.
And the media loves to talk about the
2009/3/11 Matthew Brown mor...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
It's coverage in the actual media rather than blogs isn't very
widespread. It is however cheap and easy to write so there is a
significant incentive for media organisations to pick it up.
This one is funny:
http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/03/09/postscript-to-world-net-dailywikipedia-editorial
Can't say I've ever heard of WebProNews before, but this columnist is
revising an earlier piece criticising WND. He also says I tend to think
philosophies are prisons robbing us of any
geni wrote:
2009/3/10 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
http://gawker.com/5167585/right+wing-writer-invents-his-own-obama-wikipedia-scandal
- d.
Doesn't really matter. It's been picked up by larger and somewhat
respectable right wing sources (Telegraph) so the truth of the matter
2009/3/10 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
Interesting ... last I heard the world economy was in meltdown, there is
no free-market solution in sight yet, and state intervention is running
out of zeroes. And what really interests the media is stories about
other smaller parts
@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 3:25 pm
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] So much for the Obama scandal
This one is funny:
http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/03/09/postscript-to-world-net-dailywikipedia-editorial
Can't say I've ever heard of WebProNews before, but this columnist is
revising
