On 30 October 2011 11:30, WereSpielChequers wrote:
> I'm not a big fan of abstract calls for strong leadership, and I genuinely
> don't see Arbcom as being a disaster - though there could be things it has
> done that I'm not aware of. That doesn't mean I'm opposed to changes that
> would make the
WS, what you say here is not a refutation of my arguments but simply stating
a different point of view. And Arbcom is just one small part of a much
larger and more complex problem. So I'm going to stick with my "diagnosis".
Unfortunately, there is a great deal at stake to let it go at that; but tha
I'm not a big fan of abstract calls for strong leadership, and I genuinely
don't see Arbcom as being a disaster - though there could be things it has
done that I'm not aware of. That doesn't mean I'm opposed to changes that
would make the pedia a "healthy, collaborative and fair creative
community"
