I wrote:
> > > http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2009/wikipedia/infobox/
> > >
> > > What is the likelihood of making as much as possible CSS? How to make
> > > infoboxes degrade gracefully for non-CSS browsers and IE users?
> >
> > Youch, that's messy in IE7. Lovely though it may be,
Mathias Schindler wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Håkon Wium Lie wrote:
>
>> Andrew Gray wrote:
>>
>> However, I also think the web should not be hostage to IE6/IE7
>> forever. Some designers have declared war on IE6 for this reason:
>>
>> http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/02/no
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Håkon Wium Lie wrote:
> Andrew Gray wrote:
> However, I also think the web should not be hostage to IE6/IE7
> forever. Some designers have declared war on IE6 for this reason:
>
> http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/02/norwegian-websi.html
There has been a debate
I like two things about CSS: it permits background colours. Why could they not
hav just put bgcolor="" as a new attribute in a font? Many first choices of
font face are ignored for not being present, while in PDF output, you get to
say "Embed TrueType as subset: YES", following Adobe's style gui
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
> On 3 Mar 2009 at 11:49:01 -0500, Gwern Branwen wrote:
>
>> All of those are pretty interesting things - what side of the road
>> tells you both historical information, and also is terribly practical
>> if you're there*
>>
>> * Although one
On 3 Mar 2009 at 11:49:01 -0500, Gwern Branwen wrote:
> All of those are pretty interesting things - what side of the road
> tells you both historical information, and also is terribly practical
> if you're there*
>
> * Although one certainly hopes that anyone driving in a particular
> country wi
On 3 Mar 2009 at 23:28:37 +1000, K. Peachey wrote:
> Infoboxes are tubular data (in most cases) so they can and commonly
> should be displayed in tables.
They're rectangular, but you'd have to roll them up to make them
tubular. :-)
--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.i
Gwern Branwen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Andrew Gray wrote:
>
>> On another note, wow. I hadn't realised how much stuff was in our
>> infoboxes. The five lines of government I can understand, the two GDPs
>> ditto, but do we really need a quick-reference for "proportion of area
>>
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Gwern Branwen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Andrew Gray wrote:
>> 2009/3/3 David Gerard :
>>> By Hakon Wium Lie of Opera:
>>>
>>> http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2009/wikipedia/infobox/
>>>
>>> What is the likelihood of making as much as possible CSS? H
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Andrew Gray wrote:
> 2009/3/3 David Gerard :
>> By Hakon Wium Lie of Opera:
>>
>> http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2009/wikipedia/infobox/
>>
>> What is the likelihood of making as much as possible CSS? How to make
>> infoboxes degrade gracefully for non-CSS browser
2009/3/3 David Gerard :
> By Hakon Wium Lie of Opera:
>
> http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2009/wikipedia/infobox/
>
> What is the likelihood of making as much as possible CSS? How to make
> infoboxes degrade gracefully for non-CSS browsers and IE users?
>
>
> - d.
Hmm it's broken in seamonkey.
2009/3/3 David Gerard :
>> On another note, wow. I hadn't realised how much stuff was in our
>> infoboxes. The five lines of government I can understand, the two GDPs
>> ditto, but do we really need a quick-reference for "proportion of area
>> which is water", the Gini coefficient, or the side of
2009/3/3 K. Peachey :
> The author has only taken in account standards compliant browsers
> (Firefox, Safari, Opera to name a few) which is wrong since they are
> not 100% used, i believe IE 6 which is hardly compliant in these
> matters is still at 40% usage, thats just the people visually
> acce
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:30 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> By Hakon Wium Lie of Opera:
>
> http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2009/wikipedia/infobox/
>
> What is the likelihood of making as much as possible CSS? How to make
> infoboxes degrade gracefully for non-CSS browsers and IE users?
> - d.
Infobox
2009/3/3 Andrew Gray :
> Youch, that's messy in IE7. Lovely though it may be, that 30-50% of
> our audience would not be happy...
Indeed. I emailed Hakon Lie inviting his participation, but noting
that dropping even IE6, lovely as that would be, is not a happener in
the foreseeable future. We ca
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Andrew Gray wrote:
> 2009/3/3 David Gerard :
>> By Hakon Wium Lie of Opera:
>>
>> http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2009/wikipedia/infobox/
>>
>> What is the likelihood of making as much as possible CSS? How to make
>> infoboxes degrade gracefully for non-CSS browser
2009/3/3 David Gerard :
> By Hakon Wium Lie of Opera:
>
> http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2009/wikipedia/infobox/
>
> What is the likelihood of making as much as possible CSS? How to make
> infoboxes degrade gracefully for non-CSS browsers and IE users?
Youch, that's messy in IE7. Lovely though i
17 matches
Mail list logo
