I agree.
We should make a java applet out of it... I just did something like that
for a customer, it is not that hard.
jupload.sourceforge.net take a look at this.
mike
2012/3/6 Tomasz W. Kozłowski
> Firstly, Commonist is /not/ an easy tool for newbies; there's too many
> flabbergasting options
First point from Kilian should indeed be easy.
But the plans from Tomasz seem quite a lot to me, maybe it's better to focus on
the core improvements (simply cutting away unnessesary functions and adding the
needed ones). But things like sexiness seems like way to difficult (then it's
more like
Hi Tomasz,
2012/3/6 Tomasz W. Kozłowski :
> Possible features:
> * It should have some hard-coded (but localisable) information on the
> rules of contest or the licence;
> * An "info" tab (with a basic FAQ or some links) would be a plus.
> * Sexiness (i.e. easy-to-use and shiny) would be a plus.
>
This will be an answer to the few previous e-mail at once; sorry for
not replying earlier.
Firstly, Commonist is /not/ an easy tool for newbies; there's too many
flabbergasting options to choose, and there is no built-in information
on what they should be used for.
We should try to make it as sim
Commonist is easy to use (ok, when you have the proper Java version, in
other case it is a nightmare to setup). It has also a "online" version.
I don't think we need to reinvent the wheel here.
2012/3/6 Tomasz W. Kozłowski
> Dear List,
> as we all are well aware, mass upload for Wiki Loves Monu
In commonist it is allready allowed to give 1 general description. (I mostly
use the general description + an identifier template for each monument.
Mvg,
Bas
> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 19:14:28 +0100
> From: platoni...@gmail.com
> To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> CC: ne...@wikimedia.o
On 06/03/12 02:13, Tomasz W. Kozłowski wrote:
> Dear List,
> as we all are well aware, mass upload for Wiki Loves Monuments has so
> far been a tough thing to do, especially for the new and inexperienced
> participants of the contest.
>
> Wikimedia Foundation developers have done a great job on pr
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:18:32 +0100, Maarten Dammers
wrote:
> Hi Yaroslav,
...
>> regions does not work properly).
> Do these monuments have the same status? For example in the Netherlands
> we have Rijksmonumenten for the state monuments, but also Gemeentelijke
> monumenten which are designated
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Maarten Dammers wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> Op 5-3-2012 23:35, Andrea Zanni schreef:
>
> I think you have two legal issues to solve:
> 1. Copyright of the lists
> 2. The whole take photos in Italy of monuments problem
>
> If you get the first part solved we can start
