Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM statistics tool

2014-08-29 Thread Emilio J . Rodríguez-Posada
In my tools, I use to link to an official site, in the occurrences of "Wiki Loves Monuments" expression. This year I'm not sure where to point to, because http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org seems "abandoned". I'm sure that that site is receiving a lot of traffic (in Spain the contest is covered in

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM statistics tool

2014-08-29 Thread Romaine Wiki
Good you mention, I shall look for what I can do about that. The list we currently use is (for organisational purposes) at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2014/Participating_countries For the public we use: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monum

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM statistics tool

2014-08-29 Thread Santiago Navarro Sanz
One question, what about the international website? wikilovesmonuments.org I mean, now the list of countries from last year is on the website, and not the current one. Santiago NavarroDate: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 18:44:29 +0200 From: romaine.w...@gmail.com To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org Sub

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM statistics tool

2014-08-29 Thread Romaine Wiki
Hello Emilio, Ireland started earlier at 23 August. Mexico is not in the list of participating countries, so does not take part. I removed the Wiki Loves Monuments template from the two pictures from Mexico. In the table of the countries, the last column shows a link Details which links to the de

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM statistics tool

2014-08-29 Thread Emilio J . Rodríguez-Posada
2014-08-29 14:25 GMT+02:00 Dennis Tobar : > Hi: > > I'll work this weekend in my tool (Superzerocool) to move into wikimedia > cluster. > Nice, I wait the new URL. > The last year the service was provided by Wikimedia Chile, but the local > chapter will not support the contest this year (we tak

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM statistics tool

2014-08-29 Thread Dennis Tobar
Hi: I'll work this weekend in my tool (Superzerocool) to move into wikimedia cluster. The last year the service was provided by Wikimedia Chile, but the local chapter will not support the contest this year (we take a little rest due Wiki Tour contest). If I have any news, I'll send it in this lis

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Map of Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-08-29 Thread Emma Tracanella - WLM Project
Hi, I have told Romaine yesterday the correct link for the Italian list. I hope that soon the bot will be updated. :) Emma On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada < emi...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2014-08-29 11:40 GMT+02:00 Cristian Consonni : > > Hi Emilio, >> >> WLM Italy monum

[Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM statistics tool

2014-08-29 Thread Emilio J . Rodríguez-Posada
Hello; The tool for statistics is ready http://tools.wmflabs.org/wlm-stats/ I see some files from Ireland and Mexico. Do these countries start before September 1st? By the way, check that your country appear in the tables, when the first files are uploaded. CSV and JSON files with metadata are g

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Map of Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-08-29 Thread Emilio J . Rodríguez-Posada
2014-08-29 11:40 GMT+02:00 Cristian Consonni : > Hi Emilio, > > WLM Italy monuments has, as usual, a yearly list so 2014 data are in: > https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progetto:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2014/Monumenti > and subpages. > > Can you help me fix this? > I don't manage the Erfgoed bot for imp

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Map of Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-08-29 Thread Cristian Consonni
Hi Emilio, WLM Italy monuments has, as usual, a yearly list so 2014 data are in: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progetto:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2014/Monumenti and subpages. Can you help me fix this? Thanks. Cristian ___ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Map of Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-08-29 Thread Emilio J . Rodríguez-Posada
2014-07-17 22:16 GMT+02:00 Sylvain Machefert : > 2014-07-17 22:11 GMT+02:00 Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada : > > >> What stuff you think it can fit on it? Stats? >> > > Stats might be a good idea if you can have a good and easy to read summary. > > I will try. > What I had thought about was an easy