Hello,
we've been talking on french WLM mailing list after one member showed that
this year was the year the 1 000 000th WLM picture had been uploaded.
Taking categories from previous years and counting using csv file from this
year (after having excluded irish pictures that were uploaded before
There are some picture in WLM CH uploaded before the start of the contest
(which started the 8th September).
We have not excluded them because it will be communicated at the end of the
contest the reason of the exclusion.
But there are also some photos out of scope (and I suppose not only in
WLM
2014-09-22 14:32 GMT+02:00 Sylvain Machefert smachef...@gmail.com:
Are there any organizers from Poland on this list that can confirm that
this file is ok for their competition so that we can communicate ?
Hi, I checked our Polish lists, and it looks like it's not a registered
monument.
--
ok, these two answers seem to show that the best way is to say we've
reached the million mark around 15th september and not try to find the
millionth picture :) Thanks for your input.
2014-09-22 15:26 GMT+02:00 Paweł Marynowski y...@o2.pl:
2014-09-22 14:32 GMT+02:00 Sylvain Machefert
With a scientific point of view, we can choose whatever is closed to 1M as
our milestone, it is hardly reproducible due to number of files being
deleted every day.
2014-09-22 15:26 GMT+02:00 Paweł Marynowski y...@o2.pl:
2014-09-22 14:32 GMT+02:00 Sylvain Machefert smachef...@gmail.com:
Are
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Sylvain Machefert smachef...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, these two answers seem to show that the best way is to say we've reached
the million mark around 15th september and not try to find the millionth
picture :) Thanks for your input.
Announcing a number with no
Mabye make a mosaic with, say 10 000 images that could be a contender for
the millionth, to make a thing about how many they are?
*Med vänliga hälsningar,Jan Ainali*
Verksamhetschef, Wikimedia Sverige http://wikimedia.se
0729 - 67 29 48
*Tänk dig en värld där varje människa har fri tillgång
How do you guys work out the nth article on Wikipedia?
Can you use the same method?
On 22 September 2014 20:38, Nicu Buculei nicub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Sylvain Machefert smachef...@gmail.com
wrote:
ok, these two answers seem to show that the best way is to say
2014-09-22 15:53 GMT+02:00 KaewWiki kaeww...@gmail.com:
How do you guys work out the nth article on Wikipedia?
Can you use the same method?
AFAIK there is always some uncertainty (which comes handy so that you
can choose the best picture/article/thing ;o)
C
That would be cool for media-related stuff very well. I am looking forward to
show this with some post... to mobilize people to use the last week of the
contest!
Jan Loužek - Aktron
Wikimedia Czech Republic
__
Od: Jan Ainali
If anyone from the commons admin team can look at my bot request, it would
be greatly appreciated so I can start running this task.
Request:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bots/Requests/ContinuityBot
Thanks,
Jason
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Jason Spriggs
11 matches
Mail list logo
