Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] 2nd phase: Prizes for the international contest (addressed mainly to the local organizers)

pocoapocowiki, 09/12/2015 07:27: can somebody make a clear statement what are the winner pictures? A) the 25 published in Twitter? B) the 14 mentioned in WMF's blog? C) the 10 listed in the winner's page in Commons? D) the 8 awarded with a prize? Last time I checked, all the lists were

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] 2nd phase: Prizes for the international contest (addressed mainly to the local organizers)

2015-12-09 9:56 GMT+01:00 ecemaml @ es.wikipedia : > Yes, using Twitter as the only means for publishing a contest result is > really unprofessional :-( > > // M.A. Monjas > Uh ?!? Are you really responding to a e-mail complaigning it has been published in *too many* places

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] 2nd phase: Prizes for the international contest (addressed mainly to the local organizers)

Guys, can somebody make a clear statement what are the winner pictures? A) the 25 published in Twitter?B) the 14 mentioned in WMF's blog?C) the 10 listed in the winner's page in Commons?D) the 8 awarded with a prize? Enviado desde mi smartphone Samsung Galaxy. Mensaje original

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] 2nd phase: Prizes for the international contest (addressed mainly to the local organizers)

Yes, using Twitter as the only means for publishing a contest result is really unprofessional :-( // M.A. Monjas On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 7:27 AM, pocoapocowiki wrote: > Guys, can somebody make a clear statement what are the winner pictures? > > A) the 25 published in

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] 2nd phase: Prizes for the international contest (addressed mainly to the local organizers)

"Publishing" and Twitter does not fit well. What I'm plainly critizising is the fact that the complete list of 25 winners is not published anywhere. Am I wrong? // M.A. On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Nicolas VIGNERON < vigneron.nico...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2015-12-09 9:56 GMT+01:00 ecemaml @

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] 2nd phase: Prizes for the international contest (addressed mainly to the local organizers)

To summarize, it's pretty clear: why the full list of 25 winners is not published in any referenceable way? // M.A. Monjas On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:59 AM, ecemaml @ es.wikipedia wrote: > We're a bunch of volunteers asking for and receiving a grant for running a >

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] 2nd phase: Prizes for the international contest (addressed mainly to the local organizers)

We're a bunch of volunteers asking for and receiving a grant for running a professional contest. Although tweeting the full list of winner is definitely cool, it's not professional at all to have to refer to a tweet to state that I scored 20th, for instance. // M.A. Monjas On Wed, Dec 9, 2015

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] 2nd phase: Prizes for the international contest (addressed mainly to the local organizers)

Hi, It's not published in a perfect way because the jury report is still under production. I didn't want to wait for that to be finalized before announcing the winners - I had the feeling that people wanted to hear that sooner. The report is coming up, but there are also real life priorities that

[Wiki Loves Monuments] 2nd phase: Prizes for the international contest (addressed mainly to the local organizers)

Dear all, probably you know that the winners for international contest receive a prize as per this grant https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:PEG/Wiki_Loves_Monuments_international_team/2015_coordination. Like Santa Claus, I have in charge the distribution of the prizes. This how the