Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Feedback for the evaluation of WLM 2012

2012-11-04 Thread Jane Darnell
Well I wouldn't mind changing it to GLAMM - the extra M for monuments... Sent from my iPad On Nov 4, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Tomasz Ganicz wrote: > 2012/11/4 Yaroslav M. Blanter : > >> Another option, which I personally find more attractive, is to create a >> permanently functioning meta-project, s

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Feedback for the evaluation of WLM 2012

2012-11-04 Thread Tomasz Ganicz
2012/11/4 Yaroslav M. Blanter : > Another option, which I personally find more attractive, is to create a > permanently functioning meta-project, smth like Project Cultural Heritage > (scope to be discussed). It could be based on Commons or on Meta (to be > discussed, both options have advantages

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Feedback for the evaluation of WLM 2012

2012-11-03 Thread Yaroslav M. Blanter
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 20:18:29 +0100, Tomasz W. Kozłowski wrote: Hi there, a month after the end of the competition, I think it's about time we start slowly evaluating what was wrong and what was good with the organisation of the contest. ... Thanks in advance, Hi Tomasz and everyone, I was goi

[Wiki Loves Monuments] Feedback for the evaluation of WLM 2012

2012-11-03 Thread Tomasz W . Kozłowski
Hi there, a month after the end of the competition, I think it's about time we start slowly evaluating what was wrong and what was good with the organisation of the contest. In order to get some feedback from you, I just set up a dedicated page on Commons; please write down your opinions about thi