>
>
>
>> Anyhow, my tool is on GitHub too[2], although it's incomplete. The
>> category mode is working fine, but it was originally started (long ago) as
>> a downloader for preparing images for offline Wikipedia editions, based on
>> an article list, and supporting multiple parallel downloaders,
2015-01-15 21:46 GMT+00:00 Asaf Bartov :
> Thanks, Jean-Frédéric! I did not know about your tool. I did spend some
> time looking for a tool on Commons, most specifically here[1], but didn't
> find anything appropriate. It did not occur to me to just grep GitHub,
> though. :)
>
Sure. For conve
Oscar:
Thanks for your interest. I think that should seal the number of members of
the jury, as with you included, we have 3 persons now.
The selection process, I'll email you about it by tomorrow. The images
aren't many, so I think handpicking the best images wouldn't be much of a
difficulty.
O
Rexford:
Given the relatively small amount of pictures, I can be part of the jury,
if that's OK with you.
About the tool: for 100 pictures, I don't think it's worth to adapt or
create tools; even by hand, I think 100 pictures can be processed in one or
two hours. I think it's more important to st
As it stands now, we've not had Antone show interest in being a part of the
jury.
Until the jury is formed, I think you can hold on a bit. We'll get back to
you when the jury is ready.
rexford | google.com/+Nkansahrexford
On Jan 18, 2015 9:49 AM, "Ynhockey" wrote:
> Sorry for being late into th
Sorry for being late into this conversaion, but I assume you're referring
to the 2012 tool that I wrote, it still exists on Labs and I can set it up
for you if it's still relevant. Keep me posted.
—Yan (Ynhockey).
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
> Oh, and I told myself SOFI
Oh, and I told myself SOFIXIT, so I did. :)
A.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
> Thanks, Jean-Frédéric! I did not know about your tool. I did spend some
> time looking for a tool on Commons, most specifically here[1], but didn't
> find anything appropriate. It did not
Thanks, Jean-Frédéric! I did not know about your tool. I did spend some
time looking for a tool on Commons, most specifically here[1], but didn't
find anything appropriate. It did not occur to me to just grep GitHub,
though. :)
Anyhow, my tool is on GitHub too[2], although it's incomplete. The
Hi Asaf,
Based on this need, I'm building a downloader tool (as a volunteer; this
> isn't done in my WMF role) to help create such collections of
> reduced-resolution (any size you want) images for a given Commons
> category. It's not quite ready for use, but in the meantime I've created
> the c
Hello Asaf,
Thanks for getting the zip file of all the files for me. It was really
smaller than I expected.
I have gone through the 800+ images and I have selected just a little over
100 images as candidate images to present to the jury.[1]
I wish to hereby add a *disclaimer *(I've cc'ed wikimed
Hi, Rexford.
Based on this need, I'm building a downloader tool (as a volunteer; this
isn't done in my WMF role) to help create such collections of
reduced-resolution (any size you want) images for a given Commons
category. It's not quite ready for use, but in the meantime I've created
the collec
I have enough space, just the connection to transfer onto my space is the
issue.
But I think 3 Gig shouldn't be an issue to work with.
rexford | google.com/+Nkansahrexford
On Jan 14, 2015 1:13 AM, "Asaf Bartov" wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Platonides wrote:
>
>> On 14/01/15 00:50,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Platonides wrote:
> On 14/01/15 00:50, Nkansah Rexford wrote:
>
>> Thanks. We'll really love it if you help get it up and running for us.
>>
>> The category is:
>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Images_from_
>> Wiki_Loves_Africa_2014_in_Ghana
>>
>> As
On 14/01/15 00:50, Nkansah Rexford wrote:
Thanks. We'll really love it if you help get it up and running for us.
The category is:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Images_from_Wiki_Loves_Africa_2014_in_Ghana
As regards resolution, a 1080x720 will be great. Upon picking the ones
intere
Thanks. We'll really love it if you help get it up and running for us.
The category is:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Images_from_Wiki_Loves_Africa_2014_in_Ghana
As regards resolution, a 1080x720 will be great. Upon picking the ones
interested, we can hunt for their full res later.
On 08/01/15 11:25, Nkansah Rexford wrote:
In 2012, there was a tool used to sort and select images out of a
category. I hope a tool of that sort still exists.
It was in the toolserver, which disappeared ~6 months ago.
I can prepare a small dump for you, though. Which category are you
intereste
rexford | google.com/+Nkansahrexford
On Jan 8, 2015 12:59 AM, "Racso" wrote:
>
> Rexford,
>
> Can we have more information about the judging process (deadlines,
selection process, how many people will you have in your jury, any tools
you already have ready for the juries to use)?
Deadline? Yes if
Thanks for all the suggestions.
Will work on cutting down the number of images before handing over to a
jury. Lots of the images are kinda 'garbage', (i.e images with low
resolution, some even mere 50kb etc.)
In 2012, there was a tool used to sort and select images out of a category.
I hope a too
Rexford,
Can we have more information about the judging process (deadlines,
selection process, how many people will you have in your jury, any tools
you already have ready for the juries to use)?
About shortlisting:
It all depends on your tools. If juries have an effective rating tool, they
can
>From my experience as both a judge and a shortlister in WLM for the last 3
years, the ideal number to give to the jury is between 200 and 300. It
should be very easy to get down to that number from 800, if you remove the
images with technical problems (resolution too low, watermark, bad focus,
ext
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Michael Maggs wrote:
> The UK jury, of three, looked through around 500 images (cut down from the
> original 7000 submissions). That's not too much work for them provided
> they are all experienced with image evaluation and have the images
> downloaded so that the
The UK jury, of three, looked through around 500 images (cut down from
the original 7000 submissions). That's not too much work for them
provided they are all experienced with image evaluation and have the
images downloaded so that they can use efficient rating software such as
Adobe Lightroom
--
> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:22:09 +
> From: nkansahrexf...@gmail.com
> To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Help with members for a Jury
>
> Shortlist? As we we select some of the pictures, like say 30 before the
> jury g
-
>> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:01:20 +
>> From: nkansahrexf...@gmail.com
>> To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Subject: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Help with members for a Jury
>>
>> Hi, I'm rexford, from ghana.
>>
>>
@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Help with members for a Jury
Hi, I'm rexford, from ghana.
Late last year, WLA[1] was organized. ghana uploaded some 800 images[2]. We're
looking for a jury to select the best 5 images.
Myself can't be a part of jury, same as others on our team,
@gmail.com
>
> To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
>
> Subject: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Help with members for a Jury
>
> Hi, I'm rexford, from ghana.
>
> Late last year, WLA[1] was organized. ghana uploaded some 800 images[2].
> We're looking for a jury
First get the photos shortlisted..
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:01:20 +
From: nkansahrexf...@gmail.com
To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Help with members for a Jury
Hi, I'm rexford, from ghana.
Late last year, WLA[1] was organized. ghana uploaded
Hi, I'm rexford, from ghana.
Late last year, WLA[1] was organized. ghana uploaded some 800 images[2].
We're looking for a jury to select the best 5 images.
Myself can't be a part of jury, same as others on our team, because we took
part in the event.
We'll really appreciate if we could get volun
28 matches
Mail list logo
