On 19 August 2013 12:06, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>> * Scotland seems to have two templates;
>> * Cardiff seems to have it's own redundant template at
>
> Both need to be resolved.
And now prosed of merging/ deletion, at:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_A
On 17 August 2013 16:47, Maarten Dammers wrote:
> I just added England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales to the monuments
> database.
> Some issues I came across:
> * Every country has a system to go down the tree like world -> ->
> -> . We use ISO 3166-2 for that
> (https://en.wikipedia.o
Thanks Maarten, that's a very useful answer.
Richard
On 17 August 2013 18:34, Maarten Dammers wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Please send messages to the list. I'll reply inline.
>
> Op 17-8-2013 19:15, Richard Nevell schreef:
>
> Is there a way to narrow down which category images are put into? Wit
Hi Richard,
Please send messages to the list. I'll reply inline.
Op 17-8-2013 19:15, Richard Nevell schreef:
Is there a way to narrow down which category images are put into? With
thousands of uploads, even categories such as 'Grade I listed building
in Fooshire' can quickly fill up.
Yes, of c
Is {{commons category inline}} the template that needs to be used so the
the bot can automatically categorise images? Will {{commons category}} also
work and will it work if a name different to the page title is specified in
the template?
Richard
On 17 August 2013 16:47, Maarten Dammers wrote:
Hi everyone,
I just added England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales to the
monuments database. For technical details see
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49047#c3
Some issues I came across:
* Every country has a system to go down the tree like world ->
-> -> . We use ISO
