On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Lodewijk wrote:
> I assume with remove, you only mean that you don't consider them for a
> prize? (that is a fair reasoning I guess, under the 'usefulness'
> principle).
yeah, I second that, I am all for keeping lowres shots of things we dont
have pics of otherwis
Op 5-10-2012 14:57, Lodewijk schreef:
Hi Aktron,
I assume with remove, you only mean that you don't consider them for a
prize? (that is a fair reasoning I guess, under the 'usefulness'
principle).
Tamara: I would suggest to leave it up to the jury, as long as they
keep the criteria in mind.
__
> > Od: "Tamara Petrovic"
> > Komu:
> > Datum: 05.10.2012 13:10
> > Předmět: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Rating the photos
> >
>
> Hi all,
>
> We got a lot of photos which show monuments' deta
ly be used.
Aktron
Wikimedia Czech Republic
__
Od: "Tamara Petrovic"
Komu:
Datum: 05.10.2012 13:10
Předmět: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Rating the photos
Hi all,
We got a lot of photos which show monuments' details, so I don
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Tamara Petrovic wrote:
> We got a lot of photos which show monuments' details, so I don't know
> whether to point out to the jury to eliminate those or not? I mean, do the
> winner photos have to show the objects in whole?
There is no rule about this. If the detail
Hi all,
We got a lot of photos which show monuments' details, so I don't know
whether to point out to the jury to eliminate those or not? I mean, do the
winner photos have to show the objects in whole?
The other thing is we got superb photos that are of low resolution
(~1000x768) - should they be
