Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] When WikiLovesMonuments is not enough

2017-09-01 Thread Lily
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Philip Kopetzky wrote: > > P.S.: I apologise if my post is already too off topic, but I do think that > this issue is something that in the long term everyone will face. > It's on topic in the thread. In the absence of a general Wiki Loves mailing list, it's okay

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] When WikiLovesMonuments is not enough

2017-09-01 Thread Konstantinos Stampoulis
I bet that something like that would not be under COM:SCOPE But check Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com) Στις 1 Σεπ 2017 14:13, ο χρήστης "Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada" < emi...@gmail.com> έγραψε: Hi all; Sure WikiLovesMonuments is an awesome project and it produces a lot of high quality image

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] When WikiLovesMonuments is not enough

2017-09-01 Thread Philip Kopetzky
Hi Emilio! Yeah, we've been facing that dilemma in Austria for a few years now, with 97% photo coverage of all monuments in Austria. This year we started "WikiDaheim" (translates to "Wiki in your home area"), which not only takes into account the monuments, but other aspects of everyday life in Au

[Wiki Loves Monuments] When WikiLovesMonuments is not enough

2017-09-01 Thread Emilio J . Rodríguez-Posada
Hi all; Sure WikiLovesMonuments is an awesome project and it produces a lot of high quality images of notable cultural heritage. But I will take this opportunity to remember a little known tool/project, Commons Coverage.[1] The motto is "Imagine a world in which every single free image is surroun