On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Tobias Oelgarte
wrote:
> Am 17.06.2012 01:21, schrieb Anthony:
>
>>> I have never seen a "censorware" that works
>>> flawlessly (not even china can do this right). Either it allows to much
>>> (incomplete blacklist) or it is unnecessary limited (incomplete whitelis
* Tobias Oelgarte wrote:
>Am 17.06.2012 01:21, schrieb Anthony:
>>> I have never seen a "censorware" that works
>>> flawlessly (not even china can do this right). Either it allows to much
>>> (incomplete blacklist) or it is unnecessary limited (incomplete whitelist
>>> producing angry mob). Additio
Am 17.06.2012 01:21, schrieb Anthony:
I have never seen a "censorware" that works
flawlessly (not even china can do this right). Either it allows to much
(incomplete blacklist) or it is unnecessary limited (incomplete whitelist
producing angry mob). Additionally it has to suite the view of the pa
> I have never seen a "censorware" that works
> flawlessly (not even china can do this right). Either it allows to much
> (incomplete blacklist) or it is unnecessary limited (incomplete whitelist
> producing angry mob). Additionally it has to suite the view of the parents
> and match the age of the
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Tom Morris wrote:
> On Friday, 15 June 2012 at 13:21, David Gerard wrote:
>> I don't recall seeing any, but did anyone actually explain why the
>> market had not provided a filtering solution for Wikipedia, if there's
>> actually a demand for one?
>
> Market failur
On Saturday, 16 June 2012 at 23:51, Tobias Oelgarte wrote:
> Am 16.06.2012 23:36, schrieb Tom Morris:
> > On Saturday, 16 June 2012 at 20:21, Tobias Oelgarte wrote:
> > > That means they already found a solution to their problem that includes
> > > the whole web at once. As you might have noticed
Am 16.06.2012 23:36, schrieb Tom Morris:
On Saturday, 16 June 2012 at 20:21, Tobias Oelgarte wrote:
That means they already found a solution to their problem that includes
the whole web at once. As you might have noticed it isn't perfect. I
guess that it could be easily improved over time. But t
On Saturday, 16 June 2012 at 20:21, Tobias Oelgarte wrote:
> That means they already found a solution to their problem that includes
> the whole web at once. As you might have noticed it isn't perfect. I
> guess that it could be easily improved over time. But the image filter
> had an different goa
Am 15.06.2012 23:22, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:21 PM, David Gerard wrote:
I don't recall seeing any, but did anyone actually explain why the
market had not provided a filtering solution for Wikipedia, if there's
actually a demand for one?
(IIRC the various netnannies f
Am 14.06.2012 22:40, schrieb Risker:
On 14 June 2012 16:19, David Gerard wrote:
On 14 June 2012 20:36, Andrew Gray wrote:
Least surprise is one way to try and get around this problem of not
relying on the community's own judgement in all edge cases; I'm not
sure it's the best one, but I'm n
I also want to say something good. I think the fact that the
fundraising team is using multivariate analysis instead of simple A/B
testing now is beyond good, it's just spectacular. A/B testing was
excruciatingly slow, and this is a huge advance. I hope it means that
all the banner text suggesti
Forwarding this from the CC-licenses list. The WMF should explore
what impact, if any, one-way CC-BY-SA to GPL compatibility would have
on WMF projects. Is anyone at the WMF talking to CC/FSF about this?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Christopher Allan Webber
Date: Thu, May 31, 2
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:22 PM, James Forrester wrote:
> There are lots of things we could do - for instance, blocking all
> edits except by logged-in editors would solve this (but is profoundly
> against our general operating principles)
It's really not, considering how incredibly easy it is to
Dear Wikimedians,
The final round for the 2011 Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year
contest is now open!
The 36 images were chosen from the first round, thanks to voters like
you. In order to determine the very best picture of the remaining
candidates, you have exactly one vote left.
The finali
I do hear and understand the argument here, but it is somewhat
problematic to have to have the argument "if we do this, we'll be
handing over information to sockpuppeteers we don't want them to have,
and we can't tell you what that information is, because otherwise
we'll be handing over informatio
15 matches
Mail list logo
