Dario Taraborelli, 12/10/2012 15:41:
On Oct 12, 2012, at 2:11, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
we have some preliminary usage data coming from the FeedbackPage:
http://toolserver.org/~dartar/fp/
Graphs are empty for me there, is it just me?
We have a temporary hardware issue
Can I second this one, we've run into it occasionally in WMAU outreach
sessions as well, and it's always fun explaining why it's said no to
someone without a foundation in computers or internet culture. A brief
explanation of why it's happened and what to do in order to not lose your
edit, made
If you are planning an event it is fairly easy to get your IP address
temporarily whitelisted from the account creation throttle. You just
need to know your IP address that will be used.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Craig Franklin cr...@halo-17.net wrote:
Can I second this one, we've run
On 14 October 2012 13:59, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are planning an event it is fairly easy to get your IP address
temporarily whitelisted from the account creation throttle. You just
need to know your IP address that will be used.
Is it possible to whitelist IPs from the
IPs shouldnt get hit with an edit throttle, (it is really really high)
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
On 14 October 2012 13:59, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are planning an event it is fairly easy to get your IP address
On 14 October 2012 15:50, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote:
IPs shouldnt get hit with an edit throttle, (it is really really high)
It doesn't seem it! Over the past few months, I've had it triggered
four times in an hour in two workshops, and one or two times in
perhaps four more. They're
Next time you get said message can you take a screenshot and let us
know, (it is by default somewhere over 60/edits per minute)
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
On 14 October 2012 15:50, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote:
IPs shouldnt get hit
Dear all,
I wanted to update you on behalf of the Affiliations Committee that we are
now considering the application of a proposed thematic organisation active
in the field of Medicine.
You can see the proposal at:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Medicine
We would like to invite you to
Hi folks - sharing a news release that WMF issued this morning along with STC.
(This press release is also posted on the WMF wiki at
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Press_releases/WMF_and_STC_partner_on_WP_Zero_in_the_Middle_East)
'''The Wikimedia Foundation and Saudi Telecom (STC) partner
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Thank you for enabling it again. I had read about the blind tests in
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Article_feedback/Quality_assessment
before but I see some major changes in the graphs, which are a bit hard to
On 14 October 2012 20:19, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed; I remember some (internal) announcements around this, which
caused me and no doubt others to while away an evening just after
deployment clicking helpful/unhelpful :)
I didn't spend an entire evening on it, but I can
I found it mostly useless. Not only could I mark the feedback resolved,
which should not be possible for a banned user (!), but the feedback was
either gibberish/abuse or unhelpful in the sense of (1) the material
requested was already in the article, or a linked article, or (2) the
complaint
phoebe ayers, 14/10/2012 21:19:
Also, not to state the obvious, but 'helpful' feedback in and of
itself doesn't mean the article changed for the better; I've marked
plenty of feedback 'helpful' without doing anything further about it.
Is there any data about rate of change of the articles since
Thanks for the notice.
Bence Damokos, 14/10/2012 19:07:
A bit of background:
Wikimedia thematic organisations are a new type of movement organisation,
that are similar to chapters in supporting the Wikimedia mission through
their activities in the real world, but instead of focusing on a given
Hi Nemo,
Hopefully people involved in the project are subscribed here and will
react, as well and provide a clear definition of their aims.
There are two sides to this coin: the should and the will: a thematic
organisation should not have any control or power over the projects; it is
a different
Thematic organizations have the same amount of authority over content on
Wikipedia as chapters. To spell this out clearly that means NONE. One does
not put these sorts of details in a NGOs by laws however this will be
clearly described in the policies once incorporated.
--
James Heilman
MD,
Bence Damokos, 14/10/2012 22:05:
See also the specific discussions on this question at:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Medicine#Other
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Medicine#Liability
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Iridescent#arbitrary_break_2 (and
above)
James Heilman, 14/10/2012 22:18:
Thematic organizations have the same amount of authority over content on
Wikipedia as chapters. To spell this out clearly that means NONE. One does
not put these sorts of details in a NGOs by laws [...]
Actually, chapters do and very clearly, as a general rule.
2012/10/14 James Heilman jmh...@gmail.com:
Thematic organizations have the same amount of authority over content on
Wikipedia as chapters. To spell this out clearly that means NONE. One does
not put these sorts of details in a NGOs by laws however this will be
clearly described in the policies
Will access to Wikipedia for people in Saudi Arabia be uncensored?
Has there been any agreement with Saudi Telecom on censorship?
Andreas
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Jay Walsh jwa...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi folks - sharing a news release that WMF issued this morning along with
STC.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Theo10011 de10...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Moushira Elamrawy moushi...@gmail.com
wrote:
@Andreas: Censorship! Thats interesting --but my understanding is that
Wikiipedia is fine in KSA, except for some visual content that is
21 matches
Mail list logo
