Hi Jessie,
Thanks for following up.
I think Gayle will be responding to this thread also, but she is a little
busy right now as I think we can all understand.
In the meantime, I hope that you add to your list of all places receiving
movement funding resources any major projects within WMF.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:30 AM, ENWP Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
In the meantime, I hope that you add to your list of all places receiving
movement funding resources any major projects within WMF. I think the
situation with AFT5 repeating some errors from IEP which were well
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 3:30 PM, ENWP Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
May I ask, if you're working on things like the Learning Portal, what
are Frank and other people within the programs and evaluations
group working on? I'm interested in seeing a list of the current
initiatives, what
Hi all,
I’m happy to announce the first round of Individual Engagement
Grantees today! The Wikimedia Foundation makes a variety of types of
grants, many of which focus on groups and organizations. Individual
Engagement Grants exemplify our commitment to increase support to
individual contributors
She has been to every country in Latin America
and the Caribbean except Brasil.
Why not Brasil? :'(
:p welcome, and come to Brasil!!!
On 28 March 2013 23:06, Everton Zanella Alvarenga t...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Good point, Florence.
Is it like if we hired someone for a education position
I hear 2014 will be a very busy year in Brasil
Some sport thing with a ball and a large green pitch :)
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com wrote:
She has been to every country in Latin America
and the Caribbean except Brasil.
Why not Brasil?
One needn't stick around to establish and maintain a working framework
for such - continuity and knowledge-transfer sounds rather like
consistency and maintainability of code, where if it is well set up and
documented anyone can reasonably pick up where someone else left off.
So to ensure
On 29 March 2013 19:22, Balázs Viczián balazs.vicz...@wikimedia.hu wrote:
I'd rather be interested in how do you measure _success_ (this question is
for everybody)
By hard outcomes measured against the original project goals.
Turning that around - projects should not be funded without
Hi,
I've just seen an OTRS ticket asking why isn't Wikipedia giving its
pages for adoption (like when you adopt a page and your name ends up
on its cage or something like that). I've moved the ticket to the
donations queue, but I was wondering if this has ever been
discussed/considered before.
Where would their name go? If it's anywhere more prominent than the names
of the volunteers that wrote the article (which anything on the article
page itself would be) then it doesn't really seem fair...
On Mar 29, 2013 10:37 PM, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've just seen an OTRS
[off-topic]
2013/3/29 Matthew Roth mr...@wikimedia.org
I hear 2014 will be a very busy year in Brasil
Some sport thing with a ball and a large green pitch :)
Yeah, we are going to have the world cup, where millions and millions
of reais (our currency) is going to corrupts to an event that
Because we've decided that [[WP:Ownership of articles]] is wrong, and
wronger if there's financial sponsorship involved.
On 29 March 2013 22:36, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've just seen an OTRS ticket asking why isn't Wikipedia giving its
pages for adoption (like when you adopt
Yes, but it might be nice if we could let people pay trusted editors to
improve articles (without a COI and with a NPOV) that normally wouldn't get
attention.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Deryck Chan deryckc...@wikimedia.hkwrote:
Because we've decided that [[WP:Ownership of articles]] is
On Mar 30, 2013 12:55 AM, Mono monom...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but it might be nice if we could let people pay trusted editors to
improve articles (without a COI and with a NPOV) that normally wouldn't
get
attention.
Would that be nice? I think that would be very harmful...
How so?
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mar 30, 2013 12:55 AM, Mono monom...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but it might be nice if we could let people pay trusted editors to
improve articles (without a COI and with a NPOV) that normally wouldn't
On Mar 30, 2013 1:04 AM, Mono monom...@gmail.com wrote:
How so?
It would be completely against our culture. Wikipedia is a volunteer
written encyclopedia.
You would end up with a two-tier system of paid editors and unpaid editors.
There would inevitably be a lot of conflict between those
Good example.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Barbara Dieu beeonl...@gmail.com
Date: 2013/3/27
Subject: [REA] Crisis of conscience
To: rea-li...@googlegroups.com
Entire library journal editorial board resigns, citing 'crisis of
conscience' after death of Aaron Swartz
In a
It's a weird dichotomy.
I've spent several hundred quid on source material for my current topic
area. I could easily have spent several grand.
Paid editing is a major issue, because it conflicts with our culture
But if someone were able to buy my sources then it would be of huge
benefit.
And,
[still in the off-topic]
*Hopefully hotels will be so expensive that Wikimania here won't be
sustainable*.
Don't need to hope no more, hotels in Rio are *already* expensive because
of the World Cup renovations (is impossible to get a hotel in Rio for less
than 100 USD/night) and I do believe
19 matches
Mail list logo
