The entire editorial board resigned over the way the publisher was doing
it, and that it indicates the true meaning of such a precedent.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak wrote:
> hi,
>
> as far as I know, these prices are not established basing on the cost side,
> but the oppo
>
> Hi, is there any directory or file or whatever with the codes for
> campaigns?
Nope; not yet. I'll have to get Zack and Megan to write something up.
I see only codes without sense.
I feel there's a matrix joke here that I don't want to make.
~Matt Walker
Wikimedia Foundation
Fundraising Tec
Hi, is there any directory or file or whatever with the codes of
campaigns?, I see only codes without sense.
Regards...
Dennis Tobar Calderón
El 01/04/2013 18:46, "Matthew Walker" escribió:
> >
> > On an unrelated note; I can't make head nor tails of some of those csv
> > files... Are we really
>
> On an unrelated note; I can't make head nor tails of some of those csv
> files... Are we really collecting hundreds of thousands of dollars daily???
Depends on the day :p We had a 2 million dollar day when we opened the
floodgates in the US, UK, CA, AU, and NZ (We had five; I think NZ was the
Not uncommon for Xkcd :p
Although the article being used is changing so rapidly that it's unlikely
to cause much disruption.
On an unrelated note; I can't make head nor tails of some of those csv
files... Are we really collecting hundreds of thousands of dollars daily???
:s
Tom
On Monday, April
As a side note, the first panel of the comic also openly calls its readers
to edit war over certain articles.
On 1 April 2013 20:22, Manuel Schneider wrote:
> Did you see this April's Fool Day comic on xkcd, with an interactivly
> growing dog: "The dog gains a pound for every $10 donated to the
>
> Campaign "unfuckingknown", with the medium being "spontaneous".
The amusing entries are either people fuzzing us; or us testing. There's
very little validation of the campaign tracking fields. What comes into the
system goes out of the system. We probably should clean the data up a
little bett
Am 01.04.2013 22:06, schrieb Benoit Landry:
> Campaign "unfuckingknown", with the medium being "spontaneous". Perhaps it is
> some sort of error handler, when a donation comes from a source the system
> cannot determine due to some glitch, it puts it there? ;)
maybe it is possible to set your ow
Campaign "unfuckingknown", with the medium being "spontaneous". Perhaps it is
some sort of error handler, when a donation comes from a source the system
cannot determine due to some glitch, it puts it there? ;)
,Salvidrim
> Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:45:18 +0100
> From: morton.tho...@googlemai
Manuel Schneider, 01/04/2013 21:42:
Thanks Marc and Michael!
Am 01.04.2013 21:28, schrieb Marc A. Pelletier:
http://samarium.wikimedia.org/
My understanding is that this was done in collaboration with Randall,
but it has obvious general applicability.
thanks for this link, I didn't know abo
Heh, the CSV's have some amusing, umm. campaign names in them...
Tom
On 1 April 2013 20:42, Manuel Schneider wrote:
> Thanks Marc and Michael!
>
> Am 01.04.2013 21:28, schrieb Marc A. Pelletier:
>
> > http://samarium.wikimedia.org/
> >
> > My understanding is that this was done in collaboration
Thanks Marc and Michael!
Am 01.04.2013 21:28, schrieb Marc A. Pelletier:
> http://samarium.wikimedia.org/
>
> My understanding is that this was done in collaboration with Randall,
> but it has obvious general applicability.
thanks for this link, I didn't know about this site and data. This is
v
On 4/1/2013 12:22 PM, Manuel Schneider wrote:
Did you see this April's Fool Day comic on xkcd, with an interactivly
growing dog: "The dog gains a pound for every $10 donated to the
Wikimedia Foundation via this link."
http://xkcd.org/
Is this real? How can it tell how much has been donated to W
On 04/01/2013 03:22 PM, Manuel Schneider wrote:
> Is this real? How can it tell how much has been donated to WMF through
> this comic? I see that there is a special campaign reference in the
> donation link but how can it fetch the amount?
It is:
http://samarium.wikimedia.org/
My understanding i
Did you see this April's Fool Day comic on xkcd, with an interactivly
growing dog: "The dog gains a pound for every $10 donated to the
Wikimedia Foundation via this link."
http://xkcd.org/
Is this real? How can it tell how much has been donated to WMF through
this comic? I see that there is a spe
geni wrote:
> On 30 March 2013 20:57, James Salsman wrote:
>>...
>>
>> (A) Should the Foundation devote banner space on project home pages to
>> CISPA advocacy?[3][4]
>>
>> (B) Should the Foundation devote banner space on project home pages to
>> CALEA advocacy?[5]
>>
>> (C) Should the Foundation
Thanks Jan-Bart,
On 1 April 2013 17:17, Jan-Bart de Vreede wrote:
> With a little help from TheHelpfulOne we have made a start with the Meta
> pages for the transition team.
>
Credit to Sj and Phoebe for some clean up too!
> The central page is located at:
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ED_
Hello Everyone,
With a little help from TheHelpfulOne we have made a start with the Meta pages
for the transition team.
The central page is located at:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ED_Transition_Team
Feel free to browse and comment/suggest!
Jan-Bart de Vreede
Chair Transition Team
_
Le 2013-03-30 20:51, Steven Walling a écrit :
There's actually plenty of even more neutral ways to do this IMO, and
none
of them have anything to do with promoting the donor or paid editing.
For
example: a simple count of how many readers donated in support of
this
article. "This article spons
Le 2013-03-30 09:54, Craig Franklin a écrit :
It comes down to asking what the purpose of the Foundation and a
project
like Wikipedia is. Is it to produce a free source of knowledge, or
is to
promote volunteerism? If it's possible to build a better
encyclopædia by
encouraging paid editing or
hi,
as far as I know, these prices are not established basing on the cost side,
but the opportunity to charge scholars (who can often justify 3k expense in
a larger grant budget). All this business is quite shady and despicable in
many cases (when the publishers do not offer anything in exchange,
it seems that CEO of taylor & francis, Roger Horton [2], wanted to charge
nearly 3000 USD to publish an article accessible without paywall in their
"journal of library administration" [0]. they belong to informa, with its
CEO, Peter Rigby [1].
would 3000 usd in future be then a fair price the wiki
22 matches
Mail list logo
