Re: [Wikimedia-l] Thank you

2014-05-03 Thread ENWP Pine
> Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 07:57:15 -0300 > From: Everton Zanella Alvarenga > To: Wikimedia Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Thank you! > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > 2014-05-02 4:56 GMT-03:00 David Cuenca : > >> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Lila T

Re: [Wikimedia-l] simple and effective creation process for chapters

2014-05-03 Thread Leigh Thelmadatter
If this process is indeed really being revamped, may I ask why we give established chapters such dominance, even to the exclusion of the creation of less formal groups (user groups). As it stands, a chapter can (and in the case of Mexico, does) marginalize people and at least one educational ins

Re: [Wikimedia-l] simple and effective creation process for chapters

2014-05-03 Thread Richard Farmbrough
I am involved with a charity that sets up regional charities. We have a nominally clean procedure which can set up a charity in a few days. However a constantly changing legislative and regulatory environment can send the whole system back to square one. When we are dealing with a new legisl

Re: [Wikimedia-l] simple and effective creation process for chapters

2014-05-03 Thread Bence Damokos
Thanks Rupert for thinking about this. The chapter creation process[0] is indeed under-going review following the Board's November decision, and all comments, input is welcome. There are some reasons that make it a bit difficult to enact your suggestions or to come to the results you suggest in th

Re: [Wikimedia-l] simple and effective creation process for chapters

2014-05-03 Thread Everton Zanella Alvarenga
2014-05-03 11:56 GMT-03:00 Leigh Thelmadatter : > I would settle for an open process, rather than a secretive AffComm. > In Brazil, even trying to push an open process for years, even before AffComm existed, that didn't work. The problem is deeper. I am aware some simply gave up and jumped into o

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Quoting, etc.

2014-05-03 Thread MZMcBride
Richard Ames wrote: >There are some useful guidelines at >https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Please read >and consider. https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette (linked from the "See also" section) addresses the issue of quoting more directly. While I agree w

Re: [Wikimedia-l] simple and effective creation process for chapters

2014-05-03 Thread Leigh Thelmadatter
I would settle for an open process, rather than a secretive AffComm. > Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 10:08:22 +0200 > From: nemow...@gmail.com > To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] simple and effective creation process for chapters > > rupert THURNER, 03/05/2014 09:02: > > re

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Thank you!

2014-05-03 Thread Johan Jönsson
fredagen den 2:e maj 2014 skrev Lila Tretikov : > Hi everyone, > > > I want to thank you all for the best wishes you've expressed since the > announcement. I am very excited to be joining you as the new Executive > Director of the Wikimedia Foundation. > > > Let me tell you why I'm joining. > > >

Re: [Wikimedia-l] simple and effective creation process for chapters

2014-05-03 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
rupert THURNER, 03/05/2014 09:02: requirements to be a chapter in the bylaws: * support the mission of the wmf * be a membership organization, i.e. the highest body is the assembly of members * be a member must be possible for everybody who contributes (i.e. edits, writes software used by w

[Wikimedia-l] simple and effective creation process for chapters

2014-05-03 Thread rupert THURNER
hi, out of the experiences of creating 50 chapters, and the recent frustrated feedback from persons involved in the creation of new chapters, e.g. belgium and ghana, could we please find a simple and effective way to organize the chapters creation process? existing chapters not meeting the require