Wiknic New York City 2014:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WikNYC_July_6,_2014_one.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WikNYC_July_6,_2014_two.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WikNYC_July_6,_2014_three.jpg
There was also Wiknic organized in French speaking region in end of May
2014:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Wiknic
Since mid-2011 we also have regular events such as Tuesday Wiki
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Mardi_c%27est_Wiki.
2014-07-07 9:42 GMT+02:00 Pine W
Kevin Gorman wrote:
Regarding the IA: they have a significant interest in working with the
Wikimedia projects, a lot more experience than the Wikimedia projects have
caching absolutely tremendous quantities of data, a willinness to handle a
degree of legal risk that would be inappropriate for
IA's legality in general has apparently never been tested in court,
A bit too generic a statement; I assume you're talking only of the
legality of giving public access to Wayback copyright-eligible all
rights reserved content.
IA follows a standard which is designed to avoid litigation:
We also hosted Wiknic last Friday (to celebrate HEWP 11th anniversary):
https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%95%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%99%D7%A4%D7%93%D7%99%D7%94:%D7%9E%D7%A4%D7%92%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%9D/%D7%9E%D7%A4%D7%92%D7%A9_%D7%A7%D7%99%D7%A5_2014/%D7%AA%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%AA
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014
Some party!
On 7 July 2014 14:16, Itzik Edri it...@infra.co.il wrote:
We also hosted Wiknic last Friday (to celebrate HEWP 11th anniversary):
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:21 AM, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin Gorman wrote:
Regarding the IA: they have a significant interest in working with the
Wikimedia projects, a lot more experience than the Wikimedia projects
have
caching absolutely tremendous quantities of data,
Brad Jorsch (Anomie), 07/07/2014 17:37:
And the robots.txt for the new
version of the site denies everything, likely because the new owners don't
want the redirects or other old content showing up in Google searches. But
this has the unfortunate side effect that IA removes all the old content
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Brad Jorsch (Anomie), 07/07/2014 17:37:
And the robots.txt for the new
version of the site denies everything, likely because the new owners
don't
want the redirects or other old content showing up in Google
James, I think you may have missed the part of my message about and are
willing to work with us to address concerns we may have about their
existing services :)
In any case, given that the IA in general is way more eager to test the
boundaries of copyright law and given that they (through
On 7 July 2014 21:08, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) bjor...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Brad Jorsch (Anomie), 07/07/2014 17:37:
And the robots.txt for the new
version of the site denies everything, likely because the new owners
Now that Google has begun processing (tens of thousands) of Right to be
forgotten claims from individuals, has the WMF [or any chapter] received
notification of any Wikimedia content being removed from search results?
Is there a plan on how to respond to these? Some (notably the BBC) have
Hi Nathan,
At the moment the WMF legal team is monitoring the situation. We have been
informed that we will receive notifications by Google of takedowns, but we
have not received any notifications that have resulted in a takedown of a
Wikipedia page to date. We're assessing the impact on the
Hi all,
the Wikimedia Foundation's 2014-15 Annual Plan has just been published at
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:2014-15_Wikimedia_Foundation_Plan.pdf
accompanied by a QA:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2014-2015_Annual_Plan_Questions_and_Answers
The plan was approved by the
14 matches
Mail list logo
