On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Yann Forget yan...@gmail.com wrote:
the most urgent and important thing is to fix the
UploadWizard.
This is indeed underway, and has been for some time, with focus on bug
fixes and code quality improvements.
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/UploadWizard,n,z
REMINDER: This meeting starts in 30 minutes.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Praveena Maharaj pmaha...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Dear all,
The next WMF metrics and activities meeting will take place on Thursday,
September 4, 2014 at 6 PM UTC (11 AM PDT). The IRC channel is
#wikimedia-office
Dear all,
Please note that, due a technical issue, direct your emails to
salvador1...@gmail.com instead.
Kindly apologize for the inconvenience.
Regards,
Carlos
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
From: Carlos M. Colina ma...@wikimedia.org.ve
Date: 03/09/2014
A gmail address?
I am sure if you ask nicely the committee can be granted a wikimedia.org
email address through Mailman that will allow more than one person to
handle applications. It could probably be done pretty quickly.
Risker/Anne
On 4 September 2014 14:35, Carlos M. Colina
Thank you for the suggestion, Anne!
As some background, the reason the private e-mail address is used instead
of the AffCom mailing list is that it allows the incoming applications to
be looked at all at the same time - thus not giving anyone an advantage or
disadvantage based on the time they
Committees can have more than one mailing list, Bence.
I suggest that Affcom rethink its approach: there's no good reason to
assume that the order of candidacy has anything to do with selection,
particularly if it goes to a second list, and your nominating
subcommittee all has access. It is
One option to consider is establishing an OTRS queue for AffCom.
How many vacancies are there to be filled?
Greetings,
Ad
2014-09-04 21:45 GMT+02:00 Risker risker...@gmail.com:
Committees can have more than one mailing list, Bence.
I suggest that Affcom rethink its approach: there's no
Another option would be an open process on-wiki, along the same lines as the
FDC board-selected seat nominations. Is there a need to keep applications
confidential here?
Thanks,
Mike
On 4 Sep 2014, at 20:51, Ad Huikeshoven a...@wikimedia.nl wrote:
One option to consider is establishing an
Just what Risker suggested. ;-) (And I'd also support.)
Cheers,
Martin
2014-09-04 22:07 GMT+02:00 Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net:
Another option would be an open process on-wiki, along the same lines as
the FDC board-selected seat nominations. Is there a need to keep
applications
No yak left unshaven!
On 4 September 2014 21:07, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
Another option would be an open process on-wiki, along the same lines as the
FDC board-selected seat nominations. Is there a need to keep applications
confidential here?
Thanks,
Mike
On 4 Sep 2014,
Sorry, clarification: I'm alluding to Wikipedians' tendency to go off
into detailed side-discussions at the drop of a hat. I didn't mean
this as a dig at anyone.
On 4 September 2014 21:28, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
No yak left unshaven!
On 4 September 2014 21:07, Michael Peel
On behalf of Wikimedia Philippines, allow me to express my deepest
congratulations to Wikimedia Belgium for securing their affiliation! We look
forward to you guys doing a lot of good for the movement, and to explore areas
of cooperation between our two chapters. :)
Regards,
Josh
Wiadomość
2014-09-04 17:07 GMT-03:00 Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net:
Another option would be an open process on-wiki, along the same lines as
the FDC board-selected seat nominations. Is there a need to keep
applications confidential here?
That is a good idea. But that will not happen any time soon or
13 matches
Mail list logo
