Yes, I think it is the case that Fundraising and other organizations (like
the WLM coordinators, Wikimedia Italia, and Community Resources / FDC) were
working from different playbooks. But now that Fundraising has agreed to
change their plans, I think we should give them some breathing room,
especi
Who set the targets that will now not be met, how were they decided, and when
were they set? I must assume that WLM annual project was not taken into
consideration by these planners.
Cheers,
P
-Original Message-
From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@l
Hi Pine,
Thanks for bringing this up.
We have actually talked with Asaf and Sati about possible ways in which
the CCD initiative could inform toolkit development, in order to make sure
to keep them relevant, specially for emerging communities. One of the
things we want to do is user testing of the
Response to Peter Southwood's question.
Are the investigators acting in bad faith? Does a mob know it is a mob, or is
it that the people in it have lost the capacity for self-critical and analytic
thought? On the one Orangemoody article I've been able to review so far, Bosch
Sensortec (https://
Special report: Massive paid editing network unearthed on the English Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-09-02/Special_report
News and notes: Flow placed on ice
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-09-02/News_and_notes
Discussion rep
Trillium, they were not writing to " bring the apparently self-submitted
but failed drafts of articles of persons, organizations, and businesses up
to compliance with Wikipedia standards ". They were mostly posting the same
rejected article, supplemented sometimes by references that made it look
m
I just want to respond to this point in particular:
"Postponing the Italian fundraising campaign means for the first time in at
least 4 years, the fundraising team will not be meeting a target. The team
will pick up extra work in October to make up for work missed in September.
It's not possible t
REMINDER: This meeting starts in 30 minutes.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Praveena Maharaj
Date: Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:55 AM
Subject: Invitation to WMF August 2015 Metrics & Activities Meeting:
Thursday, September 3, 18:00 UTC
To: wikimediaannounc...@lists.wikimedia.org
Dear
2015. 9. 3. 오전 6:00에 "Trillium Corsage" 님이 작성:
>
> The Orangemoody network seems to have been providing a service: bring the
apparently self-submitted but failed drafts of articles of persons,
organizations, and businesses up to compliance with Wikipedia standards and
get them live, then accept a p
In my travels in the L&E workshop pages, I can't recall seeing a reference
from the toolkits to the CCD initiative pages, and I am hoping to see links
from CCD pages to the toolkits as the latter are built out.
I have encouraged L&E to design toolkits with new or emerging communities
in mind, and
I'm glad you like it.
What about the project pages made you conclude it's not already interfacing
with L&E? Have you noticed the Resources sections, in particular?
A.
On Sep 3, 2015 12:21 AM, "Pine W" wrote:
> In general I'm glad to see this project moving forward. I would encourage
> the p
In general I'm glad to see this project moving forward. I would encourage
the project to interface with the ongoing work in L&E about toolkits, as
well as the Learning Patterns Library.
Thanks,
Pine
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://
If WMF decides to completely remove Superprotect and the Board's
forthcoming policy prohibits the reintroduction of Superprotect without
Board authorization, I won't object to that outcome.
Pine
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.
13 matches
Mail list logo
