Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Affiliates] Changes to current chapter and thematic organisation criteria

> On 23 Aug 2016, at 11:48, Asaf Bartov wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Chris Keating > > wrote: > >>> Does the Affiliations Committee have a list of existing chapters which do >>> not meet the proposed criteria? I think we should at least get a

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Affiliates] Changes to current chapter and thematic organisation criteria) + opening WUG applications for Chapter and ThOrgs

Thanks Carlos - that seems a very clear explanation of where we are to me. Regards, Chris On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Carlos M. Colina wrote: > Hello Rogol, > > Let me try to clarify that. When the AffCom discussed with the board > liaisons whether we needed a new resolution at our July m

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Changes to current chapter and thematic organisation criteria) + opening WUG applications for Chapter and ThOrgs

Hello Rogol, Let me try to clarify that. When the AffCom discussed with the board liaisons whether we needed a new resolution at our July meeting, we agreed that the existing resolution [1] is already sufficient as we're not stepping outside of the existing framework. These criteria are a fi

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Affiliates] Changes to current chapter and thematic organisation criteria

Thanks for these updates, Carlos and all. On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Salvador A wrote: > I want to close the chapter of this discussion related to > quantitative-qualitative criteria in order to call your attention to some > consequences of this new criteria for existing affiliates. I wan

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Changes to current chapter and thematic organisation criteria

The pronouncement of Fri Aug 19 12:36:01 UTC 2016 states "the Board of Trustees has instructed the Affiliations Committee to provisionally use these three new criteria for all new applicants" and as a consequence the Board Chair has stated, on Tue Aug 23 06:46:47 UTC 2016, "This is not a discussion