Just thought, all the solutions have been directed at the people making
money for providing the service has anyone tried contacting the companies
paying for the service, if so what was the outcome?
On 7 January 2017 at 13:41, Jacob Rogers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to
Hi all,
I want to share a few thoughts on the paid editing issue. First of all, we
do have the ability to enforce our terms of use. If there are cases where
you're encountering a severe problem with paid editing and community
efforts are not able to solve it, please get in touch with us via
Heads-up to any Wikipedia/Wikimedia peeps or interested parties that are
going to be in the SF Bay Area on Sunday, January 15, 2017 starting at 2
p.m.:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Meetup/SF/Wikipedia_Day_2017
Hope you can make it. Be sure to RSVP. Cheers! Wayne Calhoon (and Ben
Although it is probably something innocuous such as a recent need to
moderate all comments by default, I am disappointed that my comment on
the recent Wikimedia blog post which I belive should be at
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/01/06/rethinking-digital-property-yale-isp/#comment-124999
has
Dear Wikimedians,
The deadline to register for the Wikimedia Conference 2017 closes in two days!
***Please note that this reminder does NOT affect the additional
invitations regarding the Movement Strategy track that are currently
being sent out by the WMF. If you have received this invitation,
I've just crossed
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Paulinapaulina3030 but
I must confess I won't do anything out of the wiki (it.wiki) where I am a
local sysop.
Catching crosswiki paid editing is the most frustrating activity ever, a
couple of years ago I wasted two months in