Very good. If any willing editor runs into trouble or is made to feel unwelcome
or subjected to unfair criticism, that is the time to intervene. We are however
not in a position to discourage women or minority editors from "recruiting" or
encouraging other minority editors or women to edit. Any
Was it the first time I noticed this subject in the Wikimedia movement, no.
It happens too many times that people get frustrated because the gender,
color of their skin or native background is the key reason to ask someone,
instead of the qualities that this person has.
There are two main reasons
On 13 May 2018 at 01:31, Pine W wrote:
> What's making you happy this week?
The Gaia data release 2 data is out. Gaia being an ESA spacecraft that
is measuring the the position of about a billion stars:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_(spacecraft)
The most straightforward application is you
On the original topic of technology advocacy representation on the Board,
an we please get someone from the open source hardware community and Legal
to tell us how much we could save in subpoena, hardware, and overhead costs
by avoiding backdoors? Has anyone on the Board ever championed open source
On mar, 2018-05-01 at 15:51 -0700, Woubzena Jifar wrote:
> 2. Regarding having a minimum of $500 for the rapid grants program,
> this is something we’re experimenting with while we’re aligning to
> the new strategic direction. Our preliminary data is showing that
> this change will improve our abil