There is a page on Meta-Wiki with a talk page:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_website
There is also a Phabricator project:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/wikimediafoundation.org/
-greg
___
Sent from my iPhone - a more detailed response may be sent
Hi Greg, thank you for the update.
The bold visual design is interesting. Hopefully WMF's target audiences
will like it.
I have a couple of concerns. This is not intended as an attack, and please
try not to take this personally.
1. I am a bit uncertain about the appropriateness of asking
The new website highlights "Advocacy" as one of the three areas that the
Foundation deals with, along with Research and Technology. From the page
linked, it promotes the WMF's misguided and unauthorized venture into
trying to influence US immigration law, now claiming it to be something the
WMF
Hello,
After many months of work by over 100 individuals around the organization and
movement, the Wikimedia Foundation's new website soft launched this week!
You can check it out for yourself here (you may need to clear your browser's
cache): https://wikimediafoundation.org/
So what comes
SJ, other groups can meet and discuss, but they only have relevance if they
are given some legitimacy.
If the output of paralel groups is ignored, the only inspiration they can
give is about how to waste community good faith (and resources).
Having discussion groups only makes sense if there is a
