[Wikimedia-l] Re: We need more interactive content: we are doing it wrong

2024-04-27 Thread Samuel Klein
Thoughtful mirroring would address some of Amir's concerns. (Amir: which ones remain?) Could you use the gadget with a mirror? On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 1:50 PM James Heilman wrote: > The other option would be to have a copy of the OWID software on our own > servers (it is all openly licensed).

[Wikimedia-l] Re: We need more interactive content: we are doing it wrong

2024-04-27 Thread Felipe Schenone
Very well, I just deactivated the gadget from the Spanish Wikipedia and removed the now broken template from the two articles that used it, until some decision is made about it. I shared my views at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:OWID_Gadget#Three_ideas, in case anyone's interested. Kind rega

[Wikimedia-l] Re: We need more interactive content: we are doing it wrong

2024-04-27 Thread James Heilman
The other option would be to have a copy of the OWID software on our own servers (it is all openly licensed). We tried this sort of with the OWID mirror which you can see here on the wmcloud https://owidm.wmcloud.org/ And functional within a mediawiki install here https://mdwiki.org/wiki/WikiPro

[Wikimedia-l] Re: We need more interactive content: we are doing it wrong

2024-04-27 Thread Amir Sarabadani
(Not Andy, but a global interface admin in my volunteer capacity) Hi, The difference is that here the third party code is being run under the context of Wikipedia. That means even with sandboxing mitigation such as iframe (which has been broken before), it's much easier to break out and collect use