On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Peter Southwood
peter.southw...@telkomsa.net wrote:
Wonderful,
I have high expectations of your ability and willingness to solve these
problems,
Please notify us of your success so we can celebrate.
This was neither constructive nor civilised. It shows that
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de wrote:
Wikipedia articles. So they pay 10.000 Dollar to Bryce DeWitt (I know, he is
dead, I just don't want to name any living people) to write about field
theory, or John Wheeler to write about general relativity, and so on and so
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Fajro fai...@gmail.com wrote:
I also support the BI idea but this is too off-topic.
Yes, please, people. We have raised awareness just fine, let's not
discuss it here.
thanks,
Peter
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
I apologise for the break and please go on with the shit throwing
contest but I guess there is nothing wrong with paid editing if it
follows the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. Experienced editors
write better articles, people with lots of experience in their
favourite field write better
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 12/12/13 02:54, Nathan wrote:
Bitcoin isn't native currency for anyone, and anyone who wishes
to make a Bitcoin donation could certainly do so using a more standard
currency.
I would think that if anonymity is
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Steven Walling
steven.wall...@gmail.com wrote:
naturally appreciates in value, like playing the stock market or buying
gold. Avoiding lots of risky investments is something our very competent
I do not plan to get into a perpetual debate just wanted to point
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:52 AM, David Richfield
davidrichfi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not in communications at all: I'm in RD, but our Corporate
Communications team really does want to act in good faith, which is
Yeah, usually when someone wants to play nicely ask asks openly people
start to
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lars Gardenius lars.garden...@yahoo.de wrote:
No I don't think it is being addressed. Not in a serious way.
You mean it's not _solved_. Indeed.
At least one problem was mentioned in the thread which is that the
(honest, knowledgeable) newbies have
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
Their orders would be classified; disclosure of them would be a crime.
Not a problem for us, but a big problem for staff on the ground in China.
Indeed, I believe it may even be outright life threatening to have
strong
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Matthew Flaschen
matthew.flasc...@gatech.edu wrote:
But as far as I know, the U.S. government has never blocked the general
public from accessing a Wikipedia article, nor have they sent a takedown
that was based on ideology/social harmony/etc.
Instead they use
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Cristian Consonni
kikkocrist...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/8/25 Strainu strain...@gmail.com:
2013/8/25 Romaine Wiki romaine_w...@yahoo.com:
Unfortunately I couldn't find any layer for Wikipedia on
http://openstreetmap.org
http://osm.org/ is an example renderer.
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
Bear in mind that OSM is a community such as we are, with its own
habits and ideas.
As I happen to be one of the more active ones in Hungary. :-)
The idea of OSM is to have everything in one databse
Nope. You will
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Romaine Wiki romaine_w...@yahoo.com wrote:
An intelligence agency that apparently hasn't done enough intelligence to
know that doing such action would cause the opposite
Possibly there will be a rise in the number of janitors against the
number of intelligence
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Martin Rulsch
martin.rul...@wikimedia.de wrote:
Free give-aways are okay. But a shop where Wiki* stuff can be sold, might
be a problem.
Possibly out of the tread but let me comment that anyone anytime could
sell anything from Wikipedia until s/he follows the
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak dar...@alk.edu.pl wrote:
well put. I think that clearly WMF legal department assumed that having the
trademark registered is such a good idea that it does not require a
dialogue with the community,
My _general_ problem, however, that I have
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
Next time someone balks at my day rate, I'm just going to say I need a new
Ferrari and twenty new Hugo Boss suits a year or you'll feel the force of a
discrimination case at the employment tribunal.
And I'll remind you to
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Leslie Carr lc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Though I do feel that the WMF salary is discriminating against my
right to fly first class everywhere. My champagne glass won't refill
itself, you know!
Do you accept donations?
g
,
Peter
([[user:grin]] / [[:hu:user:grin]] / Peter Gervai)
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter Gervai, 21/02/2013 11:04:
I can help supporting OTRS, and Wikimedia Hungary can officially
support it as well. I do not intend to look for alternatives, partly
because I'm quite happy with OTRS, partly
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Michel Vuijlsteke wikipe...@zog.org wrote:
Well, it's certainly a possible starting point for discussion:
http://www.wikipediaredefined.com/
Yes, interesting.
I asked them about whether they intend to keep it teling us instead
of discussing it (no email list but
20 matches
Mail list logo