The difference between categories and tags is semantic but those semantics
determine how the feature is used.
I suppose from an abstract technical perspective what is needed is
different classes of category-like objects based on the purpose it should
serve and displayed separately and possibly
I wonder if we could do a survey of readers from underrepresented groups.
Even if a group is underrepresented as editors that doesn't mean they ate
underrepresented as readers (for example women) (plus survey results could
be cited in potential deletion discussions)
We may want to think about the
Maybe it is time to consider taking highly useful but less maintained bots
and adding them to Wikipedia architecture. Wmf can offer (not force) to
take them over.
On Sep 9, 2013 2:22 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Sarah Stierch, 09/09/2013 19:26:
Yeah..I've noticed that
I think the key here is not to keep more information about users than
necessary.
Of course, there is the question of if the NSA asks for our checkuser data.
I am relatively confident of WMF's honesty here. They have been pretty
concerned about user privacy in general (I am sure that there is
Orkut used to dominate outside US and Europe. Then Google took over,
neglected it and Facebook moved in. Classic big company takes small company
and forgets about it
On Mar 17, 2013 11:39 AM, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com wrote:
Facebook here is more used than Google and
