Hi everyone,
Splitting the thread off to avoid hijacking it
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Mitar wrote:
> I think this conversation is diverging from the question of the
> *service* we should offer to others to licensing of the content.
> Licensing does not say anything about the service one
Hi Gilles,
Thanks for leading this! My reading of your agenda leads me to believe
that this is intended as a "problem solving" meeting, as described in
User:RobLa-WMF/Meetings#Taxonomy. To quote that article:
*Problem-solving* - Discuss a problem that we don’t know how to solve.
> "Conversation
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:32 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>
> It is important to note that WMF itself is not in any way neutral on
> this issue: adding MPEG4 is explicitly listed as a 2014 goal for the
> Multimedia team.
>
> That is, it has already been determined that this is *going to happen*.
>
> h
