On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Fae wrote:
> I'm hoping that the WMF can set a lead by publishing a calculation of
> admin ratio for themselves. ;-)
>
> PS staff salaries are not all automatically 'admin', I hope we can
> agree that some
> program activities are entirely justifiably supported by
Hey Dan,
Sure : http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconnaissance_d'utilit%C3%A9_publique
and http://vosdroits.service-public.fr/associations/F1131.xhtml
In France all associations are, a priori, charities. The french fiscal
services can withdraw that status for many reasons. One of them is if
they bel
AFAIK , WMDE and WMCH are the last ones. I do not remember an announce about
WMUK for the next fundraising.
but I don't understand what's the link with the FDC. In general I would
encourage to avoid to speak about paiement processing out of its specific
context, that's mean fundraising process
Christophe,
About this "reconnaissance d'utilite publique" or "supercharity" concept;
is there a link to an analysis (preferable) or even just the text of the
law/provision/regulation? Even one in French only would be OK, I'm just
curious to know more about how it works in practice.
-Dan
Dan Ros
On 29 April 2013 21:28, Christophe Henner
wrote:
...
> In face of that situation, Wikimedia France board has asked WMF to
> stop being a payment processor in 2013
Hi Christophe, thank you for giving this difficult decision some
suitable context, and for doing so openly and promptly.
Could someon
Hi everyone,
A quick email to announce and explain current WMFr payment processor status.
As some of you know, French regulations makes it hard to transfer ver
50% of the fund raised locally to an international organisation.
Until know, WMFr budget was always somewhat equal to 50% of the money
r