Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > Asaf Bartov, 25/01/2014 03:12: > > Thanks! The most interesting datum I've noticed so far is the rate of >> active editor (5+ edits/month) retention among new contributors after >> six months, which is about 0.4%. >> > > Is "active e

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

Hello Nemo, Sorry for the confusing in-line, I entered the conversation late, and appreciate your patience. I do not think I am understanding what definition information you are asking for. The definition of how we defined the windows for 3 and 6 month follow-up is written on the overview page i

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

Hi Jaime. Your inline replying format highly confuses me, but I tried to reconstruct what you meant to say and I believe it's what below. Jaime Anstee, 25/01/2014 20:19: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) > Is "active editor retention" a metric defined somewhere? It's not

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Strainu wrote: > 2014-01-25 rupert THURNER : > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:37 PM, LiAnna Davis > wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:45 AM, rupert THURNER < > rupert.thur...@gmail.com>wrote: > >>> > >>> lianna, where did you get that number from? > >>> > >>

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > Asaf Bartov, 25/01/2014 03:12: > > Thanks! The most interesting datum I've noticed so far is the rate of >> active editor (5+ edits/month) retention among new contributors after >> six months, which is about 0.4%. >> > > Is "active

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

2014-01-25 rupert THURNER : > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:37 PM, LiAnna Davis wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:45 AM, rupert THURNER >> wrote: >>> >>> lianna, where did you get that number from? >>> >>> I want credit for this report to go where it belongs -- the Program >> Evaluation team! I'm

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:37 PM, LiAnna Davis wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:45 AM, rupert THURNER > wrote: >> >> lianna, where did you get that number from? >> >> I want credit for this report to go where it belongs -- the Program > Evaluation team! I'm just assisting with publishing and di

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:45 AM, rupert THURNER wrote: > > lianna, where did you get that number from? > > I want credit for this report to go where it belongs -- the Program Evaluation team! I'm just assisting with publishing and distributing the report; the work in it is a whole team effort, incl

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

Asaf Bartov, 25/01/2014 03:12: Thanks! The most interesting datum I've noticed so far is the rate of active editor (5+ edits/month) retention among new contributors after six months, which is about 0.4%. Is "active editor retention" a metric defined somewhere? It's not in

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] New Program Evaluation report: Wiki Loves Monuments

Thanks! The most interesting datum I've noticed so far is the rate of active editor (5+ edits/month) retention among new contributors after six months, which is about 0.4%. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Programs:Evaluation_portal/Library/WLM#New_users That (along with the easy-to-measure and a