Message: 2
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 15:02:51 -0700
From: Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org
To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] 2012-13 Annual
Plan of the Wikimedia Foundation
Message-ID
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Of course, here the term high quality does not necessarily mean,
say, featured content (e.g. on the English Wikipedia, featured
articles currently make up less than 0.1% of the total articles), but
instead refers to
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Tilman Bayer, 29/07/2012 18:28:
Regarding the normal levels, I suppose you haven't yet had a chance
to look at http://reportcard.wmflabs.org/graphs/active_editors ?
Yes and it shows that there's still an
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:07 PM, aude aude.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Hi all,
the Wikimedia Foundation's 2012-13 Annual Plan has just been published at
On 29 July 2012 07:11, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's use the page we used to use to discuss plans and budgets:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_budget
I thought this was implicit, but apparently not: can someone from the
WMF please answer the questions that are on
I checked the page a couple of days ago and didn't see any questions: maybe
I was looking at the wrong page?
I'll ask Tilman via this mail to help coordinate getting answers from the
appropriate people.
Separately/additionally: I thought the Signpost coverage was pretty good.
It wasn't
On 1 August 2012 17:36, Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I checked the page a couple of days ago and didn't see any questions: maybe
I was looking at the wrong page?
The questions are on the page SJ suggested using:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_budget
On 1 August 2012 09:47, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 August 2012 17:36, Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I checked the page a couple of days ago and didn't see any questions: maybe
I was looking at the wrong page?
The questions are on the page SJ suggested using:
Hi, folks.
I've also tried to address the (truly confusing) use of the word grants
across the plan. See here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_budget#Wikimedia_Grants_budget
Cheers,
Asaf
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 1 August
Tilman Bayer, 29/07/2012 18:28:
Regarding the normal levels, I suppose you haven't yet had a chance
to look at http://reportcard.wmflabs.org/graphs/active_editors ?
Yes and it shows that there's still an increase over the pre-WLM
situation. Actually I was reading
Samuel Klein wrote:
I know a few people would like to see the talk namespaces of
wikimediafoundation.org opened up to general discussion, but that's a bit
tricky with raw HTML being allowed there.
This shouldn't be a blocker. Disallow raw HTML on talk pages?
Simply restrict editing to a
On Jul 29, 2012 7:01 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Risker wrote:
This is a very good point, Thomas. Why exactly is there no place on a
community wiki where this is being discussed? Instead it is being
discussed on a mailing list to which the vast majority of the community
Thomas Dalton wrote:
On Jul 29, 2012 7:01 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Risker wrote:
This is a very good point, Thomas. Why exactly is there no place on a
community wiki where this is being discussed? Instead it is being
discussed on a mailing list to which the vast majority of
Keegan Peterzell, 29/07/2012 08:29:
For editing, that is. I have what I presume to be my obituary on the
wiki: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/User:Kpeterzell
The situation of WMFwiki is indeed frustrating, but could we avoid OT in
this thread? Unless it's a subtle strategy to make the
On 7/28/12 5:58 AM, Tilman Bayer wrote:
Hi all,
the Wikimedia Foundation's 2012-13 Annual Plan has just been published at
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:2012-13_Wikimedia_Foundation_Plan_FINAL_FOR_WEBSITE.pdf
accompanied by a QA:
Florence Devouard, 29/07/2012 13:37:
But seriously... I would feel fine with us trying to claim that the GEP
is the largest system effort to INCREASE the number of articles. It is
probably true.
But we all know that the result is... so and so. Possibly good content,
but also lot's of crap being
On 29 July 2012 15:17, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
It seems to me despite the WMF's stated confidence, that the FDC allocating
money to WMF for the GAC is somewhat questionable. Given that the WMF has
failed, so far, to show a capacity for properly administering the existing
grants by
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 7/28/12 5:58 AM, Tilman Bayer wrote:
Hi all,
the Wikimedia Foundation's 2012-13 Annual Plan has just been published at
On Jul 30, 2012 7:18 AM, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On 7/28/12 5:58 AM, Tilman Bayer wrote:
Hi all,
the Wikimedia Foundation's 2012-13 Annual Plan has just been published
at
Hi all,
the Wikimedia Foundation's 2012-13 Annual Plan has just been published at
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:2012-13_Wikimedia_Foundation_Plan_FINAL_FOR_WEBSITE.pdf
accompanied by a QA:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2012-2013_Annual_Plan_Questions_and_Answers
The plan
46 millions?? That is a joke right? Please someone tell me that this is a
joke.
_
*Béria Lima*
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a
construir esse sonho. http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos*
On
On Jul 29, 2012 3:33 AM, Béria Lima berial...@gmail.com wrote:
46 millions?? That is a joke right? Please someone tell me that this is a
joke.
It's not a very large increase on last year. It's a little tricky to make
sure you are comparing like with like given the new way of treating chapter
I'm more curious about where the 9.9 million in revenue will come from in
Q4, to be honest. (P.64 of the plan) Absent that, I'm not seeing how all
those new positions (particularly the 30 in Engineering) will be paid for.
Risker/Anne
On 28 July 2012 22:32, Béria Lima berial...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 29, 2012 3:45 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm more curious about where the 9.9 million in revenue will come from in
Q4, to be honest. (P.64 of the plan)
The plan does seem to be missing the details on revenue... Isn't there
normally a slide breaking down revenue into
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi all,
the Wikimedia Foundation's 2012-13 Annual Plan has just been published at
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:2012-13_Wikimedia_Foundation_Plan_FINAL_FOR_WEBSITE.pdf
accompanied by a QA:
phili...@wikimedia.org
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
It's not a very large increase on last year. It's a little tricky to make
sure you are comparing like with like given the new way of treating chapter
revenues and spending, but I think the
26 matches
Mail list logo
