Hoi,
Well if this was not a Wiki, I could agree with you. However in a Wiki we
need to be complete, we need to understand an issue and work towards a
solution. Your assertion that the community "is not fixing that problem and
indeed is unable to fix that problem" is therefore an assertion that is
b
Gerard
Thank you for explaining to me what it is that I fail to understand. In
the same spirit, let me adopt for once your own, somewhat assertive
terminology, to explain to you what you do not understand, namely the scale
of the problem: the major Wikipedia projects have millions of unreferenced
Hoi,
The thing you fail to understand is how much of what we do is done by a
community. What we need is collaboration with the world of libraries. It is
embodied by librarians and yes, it is important that they are on our side.
To be on our side, they need to know Wikipedia, what we are doing in
Wi
Jake
Thanks for that, but I think we need to preserve a sense of proportion
here. According to a recent WMF Research finding, see
https://wikimediafoundation.org/2019/04/03/can-machine-learning-uncover-wikipedias-missing-citation-needed-tags/
,"one
out of four articles in English Wikipedia does n
Librarians and library lovers,
Next month from May 15th to June 5th we will be joining together around the
world to make Wikipedia more reliable. You can participate in #1Lib1Ref by
simply adding a citation to Wikipedia's content.
That's all we ask and imagine: a world in which every librarian (