[Wikimedia-l] Announcing Community Strategy Liaisons

2019-04-19 Thread Kelsi Stine-Rowe
Hello Wikimedians! As part of the roll out for community conversations [1] in our movement strategy [2], I am pleased to share with you that a team of Community Strategy Liaisons have been hired and begun their new role. Community Strategy Liaisons [3] are part-time contractors who lead outreach

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Announcing Community Strategy Liaisons

2019-04-19 Thread Samuel Klein
Wonderful; thanks Kelsi and +++ to all the liaisons. On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:04 PM Kelsi Stine-Rowe wrote: > Hello Wikimedians! > > As part of the roll out for community conversations [1] in our movement > strategy [2], I am pleased to share with you that a team of Community > Strategy Liaiso

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Announcing Community Strategy Liaisons

2019-04-19 Thread kayode yussuf via Wikimedia-l
Congratulations Kelsi and to the liaisons. We look forward to working with them. Kayode Yussuf On Friday, April 19, 2019, 6:45:24 PM GMT+1, Samuel Klein wrote: Wonderful; thanks Kelsi and +++ to all the liaisons. On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:04 PM Kelsi Stine-Rowe wrote: > Hello Wikim

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Announcing Community Strategy Liaisons

2019-04-19 Thread Jennifer Pryor-Summers
Kelsi Thanks for that announcement. An obvious question -- why did you not appoint a Community Strategy Liaison for the English language community? JPS On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 5:04 PM Kelsi Stine-Rowe wrote: > Hello Wikimedians! > > As part of the roll out for community conversations [1] in o

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Announcing Community Strategy Liaisons

2019-04-20 Thread Samir Elsharbaty
Thanks Kelsi and welcome to all liaisons. Looking forward to working with you! Samir Elsharbaty (he/him) Community Brand and Marketing coordinator Wikimedia Foundation On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 9:34 PM Kelsi Stine-Rowe wrote: > Hello Wikimedians! > > As part

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Announcing Community Strategy Liaisons

2019-04-20 Thread Paulo Santos Perneta
Why all these discussions on meta seem to be completely abandoned by the Strategy Work Groups? - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/2019_Community_Conversations/Roles_%26_Responsibilities Wasn't it supposed to exist some interaction over there? Who is the community

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Announcing Community Strategy Liaisons

2019-04-20 Thread Jennifer Pryor-Summers
Paulo, Given that the ages you refer to are for the community to feed back to the various working groups, any lack of activity there can best be described as the discussions being abandoned by the community. That's not too surprising, since very few members of the community have the time, energy,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Announcing Community Strategy Liaisons

2019-04-21 Thread Paulo Santos Perneta
Any discussion presumes two parts, so if WGs are nor expected to participate there, there is not any expectation of discussion with the community from the start. The message that is passing there is that the WGs have not the elast interest in whatever is taking place there. They placed the stuff th