[Wikimedia-l] Proposed Wikimedia Medicine Thematic Organisation

2012-10-14 Thread Bence Damokos
Dear all, I wanted to update you on behalf of the Affiliations Committee that we are now considering the application of a proposed thematic organisation active in the field of Medicine. You can see the proposal at: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Medicine We would like to invite you to

[Wikimedia-l] Proposed Wikimedia Medicine Thematic Organisation

2012-10-14 Thread James Heilman
Thematic organizations have the same amount of authority over content on Wikipedia as chapters. To spell this out clearly that means NONE. One does not put these sorts of details in a NGOs by laws however this will be clearly described in the policies once incorporated. -- James Heilman MD, CCFP-

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Proposed Wikimedia Medicine Thematic Organisation

2012-10-14 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Thanks for the notice. Bence Damokos, 14/10/2012 19:07: A bit of background: Wikimedia thematic organisations are a new type of movement organisation, that are similar to chapters in supporting the Wikimedia mission through their activities in the real world, but instead of focusing on a given c

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Proposed Wikimedia Medicine Thematic Organisation

2012-10-14 Thread Bence Damokos
Hi Nemo, Hopefully people involved in the project are subscribed here and will react, as well and provide a clear definition of their aims. There are two sides to this coin: the should and the will: a thematic organisation should not have any control or power over the projects; it is a different

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Proposed Wikimedia Medicine Thematic Organisation

2012-10-14 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Bence Damokos, 14/10/2012 22:05: See also the specific discussions on this question at: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Medicine#Other http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Medicine#Liability http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Iridescent#arbitrary_break_2 (and above) T

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Proposed Wikimedia Medicine Thematic Organisation

2012-10-14 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
James Heilman, 14/10/2012 22:18: Thematic organizations have the same amount of authority over content on Wikipedia as chapters. To spell this out clearly that means NONE. One does not put these sorts of details in a NGOs by laws [...] Actually, chapters do and very clearly, as a general rule.

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Proposed Wikimedia Medicine Thematic Organisation

2012-10-14 Thread Tomasz Ganicz
2012/10/14 James Heilman : > Thematic organizations have the same amount of authority over content on > Wikipedia as chapters. To spell this out clearly that means NONE. One does > not put these sorts of details in a NGOs by laws however this will be > clearly described in the policies once incorpo

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Proposed Wikimedia Medicine Thematic Organisation

2012-10-14 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Tomasz Ganicz, 14/10/2012 22:36: 2012/10/14 James Heilman: Thematic organizations have the same amount of authority over content on Wikipedia as chapters. To spell this out clearly that means NONE. One does not put these sorts of details in a NGOs by laws however this will be clearly described i

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Proposed Wikimedia Medicine Thematic Organisation

2012-10-14 Thread Tomasz Ganicz
2012/10/14 Federico Leva (Nemo) : > Tomasz Ganicz, 14/10/2012 22:36: >> >> 2012/10/14 James Heilman: >> >>> Thematic organizations have the same amount of authority over content on >>> Wikipedia as chapters. To spell this out clearly that means NONE. One >>> does >>> not put these sorts of details

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Proposed Wikimedia Medicine Thematic Organisation

2012-10-17 Thread John Vandenberg
On Oct 15, 2012 3:36 AM, "Federico Leva (Nemo)" wrote: > > James Heilman, 14/10/2012 22:18: >> >> Thematic organizations have the same amount of authority over content on >> Wikipedia as chapters. To spell this out clearly that means NONE. One does >> not put these sorts of details in a NGOs by la