Philippe,
Thank you for expanding on that:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Philippe Beaudette
wrote:
> I can only suspect that Lila's language here was imprecise
>
That is of course a possiblity. I would be very open to a clarification of
how the board and ED see the community's role in strate
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, Pete Forsyth wrote:
>
> Me, editorializing, very briefly for now:
>
> This answer is very bizarre. Characterizing the 2010 process as having been
> "outsourced" or not involving staff is wildly inaccurate, as I'm sure
> anybody on staff (or on the Board -- such as the board me
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
> Brief preview: the schedule has changed somewhat, because we wanted to
> take some more steps to be inclusive of staff feedback (has been underway
> for a few weeks) and community feedback (starting next week). The timeline
> will be tight, bec
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Pete Forsyth wrote:
> [Pete]
> editorializing, very briefly for now:
>
> This answer is very bizarre. Characterizing the 2010 process as having been
> "outsourced" or not involving staff is wildly inaccurate
>
>
--
Quite. The two people hired for that
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Michael Peel wrote:
>
> > On 6 Jan 2016, at 21:36, Pete Forsyth wrote:
> >
> > My final question above still stands, though, and I do feel that an
> answer
> > from the ED or the Board is in order. In November, Lila claimed
> > (inaccurately, IMO) that the 2010 pr
> On 6 Jan 2016, at 21:36, Pete Forsyth wrote:
>
> My final question above still stands, though, and I do feel that an answer
> from the ED or the Board is in order. In November, Lila claimed
> (inaccurately, IMO) that the 2010 process was "outsourced" and
> insufficiently transparent, and that
Hi Luis,
Many thanks for the swift update. I'll be looking forward to the
announcements next week.
My final question above still stands, though, and I do feel that an answer
from the ED or the Board is in order. In November, Lila claimed
(inaccurately, IMO) that the 2010 process was "outsourced"
Hey, Pete-
We'll be announcing some next steps on strategy next week.
Brief preview: the schedule has changed somewhat, because we wanted to take
some more steps to be inclusive of staff feedback (has been underway for a
few weeks) and community feedback (starting next week). The timeline will
be
I think this is a question for Patricio or Lila:
At the November 2015 Metrics & Activities meeting, Lila presented[1] a
slide outlining the new Strategic Planning process.[2]
Amid general comments about how inclusive the process would be, that slide
indicates that the draft briefly introduced at
