Re: [Wikimedia-l] deliberately lowered fundraising growth rate (was: Fundraising updates?)

2012-12-22 Thread Richard Ames
Donors donate based on perceived value received. End of story. ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l

Re: [Wikimedia-l] deliberately lowered fundraising growth rate (was: Fundraising updates?)

2012-12-22 Thread Samuel Klein
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:07 PM, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote: donors who expect the Foundation to prepare for contingency James, While your statistical comments were well-informed and helpful, your comments in this thread are less so, and your frustrated approach - while presuming

Re: [Wikimedia-l] deliberately lowered fundraising growth rate (was: Fundraising updates?)

2012-12-22 Thread Samuel Klein
James, I forgot that you are not able to edit Meta. I will migrate the relevant parts of the discussion here to the wiki, since a wiki is a useful place to break down ideas and refactor solutions; but please feel free to continue posting thoughts to the list. On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:25 PM,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] deliberately lowered fundraising growth rate (was: Fundraising updates?)

2012-12-22 Thread James Salsman
I forgot that you are not able to edit Meta. Because I was accused of violating the research policy by a staff member who admitted some months later that there was no research policy. I will migrate the relevant parts of the discussion here to the wiki, since a wiki is a useful place to

Re: [Wikimedia-l] deliberately lowered fundraising growth rate (was: Fundraising updates?)

2012-12-21 Thread Nathan
Hi James, How do you see the fiduciary responsibilities of the board playing into fundraising targets? Are you suggesting the Board has a duty to raise as much money as possible? I'm also curious why you highlight deliberately slowing fundraising despite the 32% increase in revenue goals for the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] deliberately lowered fundraising growth rate (was: Fundraising updates?)

2012-12-21 Thread Nathan
I think raising a lot more money because its possible to raise a lot more money is a for-profit mentality; the WMF has been actually narrowing its scope, in the understanding that it can't solve all problems or be all things, and it makes a lot of sense to me to raise only what it already knows

Re: [Wikimedia-l] deliberately lowered fundraising growth rate (was: Fundraising updates?)

2012-12-21 Thread James Salsman
How do you see the fiduciary responsibilities of the board playing into fundraising targets? The employees of the board share their fiduciary responsibilities. Are you suggesting the Board has a duty to raise as much money as possible? No. When actual fundraising far exceeded expectations,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] deliberately lowered fundraising growth rate (was: Fundraising updates?)

2012-12-21 Thread James Salsman
Costs don't scale linearly with pageviews. Nor do donations, especially when you consider that much of that growth in pageviews now comes from the 'Global South' (where people generally have less disposable income to donate) and from mobile devices (which we don't really fundraise on,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] deliberately lowered fundraising growth rate (was: Fundraising updates?)

2012-12-21 Thread James Salsman
SJ, Thank you for your reply: Fundraising targets have been set to match our projected needs for the year, for the past few years. Does the very recent abandonment of several aspects of the Strategic Plan, after the July 2012-3 Annual Plan goal was set at $46.1 million, which itself was

Re: [Wikimedia-l] deliberately lowered fundraising growth rate (was: Fundraising updates?)

2012-12-21 Thread Matthew Walker
James, the Chief Revenue Officer reported that significant increases in fundraising would be very difficult I cannot speak for what Zack was thinking -- but I can tell you - as a member of the fundraising technology team - that I was shocked, utterly amazed, and astounded at how successful