hi,
out of the experiences of creating 50 chapters, and the recent
frustrated feedback from persons involved in the creation of new
chapters, e.g. belgium and ghana, could we please find a simple and
effective way to organize the chapters creation process? existing
chapters not meeting the
rupert THURNER, 03/05/2014 09:02:
requirements to be a chapter in the bylaws:
* support the mission of the wmf
* be a membership organization, i.e. the highest body is
the assembly of members
* be a member must be possible for everybody who
contributes (i.e. edits, writes software used by
I would settle for an open process, rather than a secretive AffComm.
Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 10:08:22 +0200
From: nemow...@gmail.com
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] simple and effective creation process for chapters
rupert THURNER, 03/05/2014 09:02
2014-05-03 11:56 GMT-03:00 Leigh Thelmadatter osama...@hotmail.com:
I would settle for an open process, rather than a secretive AffComm.
In Brazil, even trying to push an open process for years, even before
AffComm existed, that didn't work. The problem is deeper. I am aware some
simply gave
Thanks Rupert for thinking about this. The chapter creation process[0]
is indeed under-going review following the Board's November decision,
and all comments, input is welcome.
There are some reasons that make it a bit difficult to enact your
suggestions or to come to the results you suggest in
I am involved with a charity that sets up regional charities. We have a
nominally clean procedure which can set up a charity in a few days.
However a constantly changing legislative and regulatory environment can
send the whole system back to square one.
When we are dealing with a new
: Sat, 3 May 2014 19:49:20 +0200
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] simple and effective creation process for chapters
Thanks Rupert for thinking about this. The chapter creation process[0]
is indeed under-going review following the Board's November decision,
and all
