If the chapter was releasing regular press releases, the media may be more
likely to contact the chapter for comment. It makes us look more credible
and we are in their faces with a media contact more often.
On 2009-01-23, Casey Brown wrote:
>
> 2009/1/22 Kimberlee Weatherall :
> > Interesting i
Thought this press article featuring news of wikipedia vandalism would be of
interest.
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/sport/jason-donovan-to-join-gold-coast-united/2009/01/16/1231608924346.html
Nick
___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lis
I would recommend caution with "spamming" Sydney Wikipedians.
I remember in recent past where someone "spammed" Wikipedians who were
listed as supporting WMAU letting them know some important information and
community reaction was mixed. Perhaps having notices up in the usual places
would be good.
Hi guys,
I'm sure there are many who would appreciate that if you are replying to a
post from a digest, you replace the subject so that it is the same as in the
current thread. Not doing so makes it very hard for those in gmail or other
threaded email clients to follow all posts to a thread.
Plus
Not knowing the details of the system in use, but presumably this would be
entered online by the person with access to the PO Box.
Not sure if that would ease the mind of someone going to those extremes.
The data can then be entered by someone with access to the PO Box.
>
This should be embraced and as soon as possible.
There should be a organisation member level with a set fee and set
rights/privileges. This might include 2 votes and listing on the chapter
wiki. All organisations become members at this level and cost. The fee
should be x times the individual membe
I would think that many of the subpages on meta would be moved into a
website/wiki for the chapter further on down the track with links from the
meta wiki page. From looking at some of the other chapters this is the
direction they have taken.
I think it would be a messy precedent.
Nick
2008/11/13
