Ive done unix administration before. I'd not call myself experienced tho.
Intermediate perhaps, but not experienced.
Steve Zhang
Sent from my iPhone
On 12/05/2012, at 9:26 AM, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Steven Zhang wrote:
>> On 11/05/2012, at 6:49 PM, John Van
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Steven Zhang wrote:
> On 11/05/2012, at 6:49 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
>> I'd prefer stability over functionality, as our user base is small and
>> they arn't using complex features. Also upgrading takes time that the
>> two sysadmins (Andrew Garrett and myself)
Steve Zhang
Sent from my iPhone
On 11/05/2012, at 6:49 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:12 AM, K. Peachey wrote:
>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Daniel Zahn wrote:
>>> while WMF wikis are currently on 1.20wmf2.
>>
>> 1.20 Isn't a stable release, Don't recommend i
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:42 AM, K. Peachey wrote:
> 1.20 Isn't a stable release, Don't recommend it to anyone please.
> 1.19.0 is the current stable.
True! Sorry, i was merely comparing the version on wikipedias with the
chapter wikis when saying that,
did not mean everybody should always go to
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:12 AM, K. Peachey wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Daniel Zahn wrote:
>> while WMF wikis are currently on 1.20wmf2.
>
> 1.20 Isn't a stable release, Don't recommend it to anyone please.
> 1.19.0 is the current stable.
Should we upgrade to 1.18.3 or 1.19.0?
Ho
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Daniel Zahn wrote:
> while WMF wikis are currently on 1.20wmf2.
1.20 Isn't a stable release, Don't recommend it to anyone please.
1.19.0 is the current stable.
___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimed
Greetings Wikimedia Australia,
my name is Daniel, i am an ops engineer contractor at WMF and a guy
who does some statistics about Mediawiki installations.
(http://wikistats.wmflabs.org/)
While compiling statistics we noticed that there are quite a few
chapters wiki running on old mediawiki versio
