Fellow members and supporters,
A key priority for 2009-10 has to be building the chapter and make it
successful.
Before being elected to my present role, I heard lots of people saying they
felt this chapter was overly Sydney- and Melbourne-focussed not just in
activity but in priorities. There wa
rew
Sent: Sunday, 13 December 2009 7:41 PM
To: Wikimedia-au
Subject: [Wikimediaau-l] Membership, regional participation and other things
Fellow members and supporters,
A key priority for 2009-10 has to be building the chapter and make it
successful.
Before being elected to my present role,
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:41:25 +0800
Andrew wrote:
> Fellow members and supporters,
>
> A key priority for 2009-10 has to be building the chapter and make it
> successful.
> Using the figures from the secretary's report at the AGM, in regional
> terms our numbers were stable, here in WA we went f
>
> > Fellow members and supporters,
> >
> > A key priority for 2009-10 has to be building the chapter and make it
> > successful.
>
> > Using the figures from the secretary's report at the AGM, in regional
> > terms our numbers were stable, here in WA we went from 5 to 3 members
> > (I am in fact
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:16:10 +1100
Sarah Ewart wrote:
> >
> > > Fellow members and supporters,
> > >
> > > A key priority for 2009-10 has to be building the chapter and
> > > make it successful.
> >
> > > Using the figures from the secretary's report at the AGM, in
> > > regional terms our number
> everyone (particularly those of us in Queensland) to get aboard and start
> brainstorming.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Craig F.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* wikimediaau-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
> wikimediaau-l-boun...@lists.wikim
closing, I think Andrew’s idea is an excellent one, and I’d encourage
>> everyone (particularly those of us in Queensland) to get aboard and start
>> brainstorming.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Craig F.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
&g
Hi,
Before I reply, I'll note that I actually agree with Sarah here re Melbourne
- it's also evidenced by Victoria's membership following the national trend
rather than NSW/ACT's.
2009/12/13 Liam Wyatt
> So, if there is a concern that the chapter is focusing too much on Sydney
> (and/or Melbour
> Would this be a good way to empower more local activities around the
> country?
What if there was a "national meetup day" for Australia, when we got a
banner displayed on the Wikimedia sites for any Australian IP addresses,
that told people about their nearest meetup? And then we'd have a meetup
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Andrew wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before I reply, I'll note that I actually agree with Sarah here re
> Melbourne - it's also evidenced by Victoria's membership following the
> national trend rather than NSW/ACT's.
>
In fact, melbourne's situation may actually be even worse
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Andrew wrote:
>
> This assumes that meetups will fix the perception problem. I don't think it
> will - they're good for social purposes but not much else.
...
> I work in education and I know that allowing people to own their successes
> increases their willingness
2009/12/14 Stephen Bain
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Andrew wrote:
> >
> > This assumes that meetups will fix the perception problem. I don't think
> it
> > will - they're good for social purposes but not much else.
> ...
> > I work in education and I know that allowing people to own their
r 2009 11:43 PM
To: Wikimedia-au
Subject: Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Membership, regional participation and other
things
In fact, I don't even think that Sydney should be lumped in with Sydney when
talking about chapter activity in the last year :-) IIRC the only "official
Chaper events&qu
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Stephen Bain wrote:
> But who is out there, and what sort of successes would they like to
> own? And what methods would be better than meetups for establishing a
> core of regular participants?
>
While meetups do fall under our Statement of Purpose (i.e. "organise
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Craig Franklin wrote:
> having GLAM-WIKI in Canberra rather than in Sydney or Melbourne was a good
> move and defused
> any possible Sydney/Melbourne/Regional rivalry; it seems that we all see
> Canberra as “neutral ground” in that respect!
>
The reason that Canb
15 matches
Mail list logo
