Under the FTA copyright in the US is extinguished if the copyright in the
originating country was already extinguished at the time of FTA being
implimented
2009/2/11 Stephen Bain
> 2009/2/10 Liam Wyatt :
> >
> > According to the reading by the Copyright Council of Australia (who are
> the
> > mo
2009/2/10 Liam Wyatt :
>
> According to the reading by the Copyright Council of Australia (who are the
> most conservative in these matters) the rules are that the image is PD if
> the photographer *died* before 1955 - not whether the photograph was
> *published* before 1955. So, in the case of Ano
The duration of copyright in photographs was significantly extended as a
result of implementing Australia's
obligations under the AUSFTA. This made protection for photographs
consistent with protection for other types of
artistic works. For photographs in which copyrights still subsisted on 1
Janua
Oh I hate this stuff
According to the reading by the Copyright Council of Australia (who are the
most conservative in these matters) the rules are that the image is PD if
the photographer *died* before 1955 - not whether the photograph was
*published* before 1955. So, in the case of Anon photo
Can anyone who understands PD-Australia look at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Donald_Bradman_with_the_Australian_cricket_team_in_England_in_1948
please
The 1955 rule seems to being challenged again
___
Wikimediaau-l
