Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Wikipedia Bangalore Meet-up April 11, 2010

2010-04-13 Thread CherianTinu Abraham
Related news on DNA newspaper, Bangalore Ed, today http://www.dnaindia.com/bangalore/report_wikipedia-now-has-an-indian-face_1370778 http://epaper.dnaindia.com/dnabangalore/epapermain.aspx Page 8 " wikipedia-now-has-an-indian-face" Forgive the reporter for the artcile saying "online collaborative

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Wikipedia Bangalore Meet-up April 11, 2010

2010-04-13 Thread Bishakha Datta
You are more generous than me in forgiving the DNA reporter for saying dictionary for what the whole world knows is an encyclopedia.:) I feel the following misquotes/inaccuracies are somewhat damaging: *para 2 - which make it sound as if I am claiming leadership in India, setting up the office and

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Wikipedia Bangalore Meet-up April 11, 2010

2010-04-13 Thread Praveen Prakash
Bishakha Datta wrote: > > I feel the following misquotes/inaccuracies are somewhat damaging: > > *last para - the fictional quote on 'Malayalam articles having more > depth.' I don't recall anyone saying this, let alone me. well, do math ;-) probably not that much damaging ;-) -- praveenp _

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Wikipedia Bangalore Meet-up April 11, 2010

2010-04-13 Thread Ravishankar
Hi Bishaka, Welcome to Wikipedia. No ill-feelings :) I have had similar misreporting experiences with media. One way for better media management will be to take minutes during the meeting and handing over a formal written press release to the media people. We can also give contact numbers to cla

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Wikipedia Bangalore Meet-up April 11, 2010

2010-04-13 Thread Srikanth Ramakrishnan
Ravi, while that is a good point, do you think the press still will take it? I mean, it's not what they get, but what they put into the final print. Regards, On 13 April 2010 22:54, Ravishankar wrote: > Hi Bishaka, > > Welcome to Wikipedia. > > No ill-feelings :) I have had similar misreporting

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Wikipedia Bangalore Meet-up April 11, 2010

2010-04-13 Thread Ravishankar
Srikanth, 1. Whether they take or not, this will be a professional way for us to do. This will also be a good way to document our activities. 2. And if they take, it is a good chance for us to convey the exact message as it is. During the press conference on Tamil Wiki contest, while many magazin

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Wikipedia Bangalore Meet-up April 11, 2010

2010-04-13 Thread Jyothis Edathoot
Ravi, Good points. I agree that it is better to provide a prepared release. Whether they want it or not is not our issue. Further to point 3, it would be better if the media channel is limited to the designated people. Rest of the folks could just redirect all queries to them and let the designat

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Wikipedia Bangalore Meet-up April 11, 2010

2010-04-13 Thread Jyothis Edathoot
read 'an external body' instead of media in my previous email. I guess we have enough 'good experience' with non media communication as well. Regards, Jyothis. http://www.Jyothis.net http://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jyothis I am the first customer of http://www.netdotnet.com woods are lovely d

Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Wikipedia Bangalore Meet-up April 11, 2010

2010-04-13 Thread Bishakha Datta
Seems worthwhile to do both these - the most accurate bits in all the recent reports are from the Foundation's press release, which I forwarded them after the Sunday meet. Bishakha On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Ravishankar wrote: > Srikanth, > > 1. Whether they take or not, this will be a pro