As I wrote originally, we'd ideally invite people nominated by their
respective communities. Those communities that have not managed to have a
discussion and come up with nominated delegates will be represented by our
best estimate, based on relevant background (like past service in the EC,
in
Which doesn't seem to be the case for Gujarati community anyways.
On 15 Sep 2014 17:54, Asaf Bartov abar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
As I wrote originally, we'd ideally invite people nominated by their
respective communities. Those communities that have not managed to have a
discussion and come
Hi Asaf,
People editing English Wikipedia from India is a huge but not so organized
community.
So far, I haven't seen them nominating anyone for anything like the way
other language communities do understandbly due to the way en wiki
community operates.
So, I request you to include as many from
Asaf,
Why only Hindi and Marathi?
Why not Tamil, Telugu, Bengali and Sanskrit?
And yes, as Ravi pointed out English as well.
On 15-Sep-2014 10:33 pm, Ravishankar ravidre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Asaf,
People editing English Wikipedia from India is a huge but not so organized
community.
So
On 15-Sep-2014 10:24 pm, Asaf Bartov abar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
As I wrote originally, we'd ideally invite people nominated by their
respective communities. Those communities that have not managed to have a
discussion and come up with nominated delegates will be represented by our
best
Dhaval, please show a little more maturity and don't resort to dark
insinuations.
Everyone, what Dhaval meant to say was: I am upset that the Foundation is
only funding domestic travel to this consultation, as that prevents me from
coming (from the UK), despite being one of the nominees of the
Certainly, Ravi. We're working on it.
A.
On Sep 15, 2014 10:03 AM, Ravishankar ravidre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Asaf,
People editing English Wikipedia from India is a huge but not so organized
community.
So far, I haven't seen them nominating anyone for anything like the way
other
My apologies Asaf and there is nothing to sympathise about.
Kind regards,
Dhaval
On 15 Sep 2014 19:23, Asaf Bartov abar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Dhaval, please show a little more maturity and don't resort to dark
insinuations.
Everyone, what Dhaval meant to say was: I am upset that the
Thanks Ravi and Pradeep for clearing the doubts.
And yes keeping in mind, the logistics and other requirements Bangalore is
convinient location.
@Pradeep:- I didn't get this
There are a few people who have been nominated by other community
members and were neither self-nominated nor community
Hi,
I meant that a few community members have been nominated by fellow community
members. This has happened without the said community member knowing about it
and that said nomination did not happened within language community wikis.
Warm regards,
Pradeep Mohandas
Sent from my iPhone
On
Dear Asaf,
Considering the vote count before the midnight of 10th of September Mumbai
was the prefrred location for meeting.
Vote count
Mumbai - 20
Bangalore - 18
(Before Midnight, 10th of Sept.)
History:-
hi Abhinav,
I don't think they asked for the community input to decide the
location for the consultation, that seems to have sprung up on its own
somehow. The idea was always that it would be in either of the two
cities and people would be supported to come for the Consultation by
the WMF if
Hello, everyone.
This is to inform everyone that the community consultation planned for Oct
4th-5th will be held in *Bangalore*.
See here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:India_Community_Consultation_2014#Venue_choice
I will be following up in the coming day or so with more information on
13 matches
Mail list logo
