Hi Ashwin,
//, it is always better for these to be brought to light in public. Let the
public then decide whether their trust in these members was justified or
not.//
Every one is for transparency. The only request is to discuss these things
in chapter wiki or mailing list which is the appropriat
In the interests of the community if the EC by its actions has led to the
state of affairs, it is always better for these to be brought to light in
public. Let the public then decide whether their trust in these members was
justified or not.
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Pradeep Mohandas <
prad
hi Sudhanwa,
I think you have your answer here:
> Even before your mail, I had already decided not to reply anymore or
> languish within this thread, unnecessary and quite out of place. My earlier
> responses were only to clarify on the points raised which were addressed, by
> name, to me.
All,
I Completely agree with you, Vikram. And due respects to your words and to
the forum!
Even before your mail, I had already decided not to reply anymore or
languish within this thread, unnecessary and quite out of place. My earlier
responses were only to clarify on the points raised which were addr
+1.
Wikimedia India chapter governance issues should be discussed in chapter
wiki / mailing list or through internal communications.
I request everyone's cooperation in this regard.
Thanks,
Ravi
___
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists
Dear all,
>From some of the discussions, it is becoming increasingly obvious that the
sanctity of the respective forums has to be maintained under all
circumstances. Using a public mailing lists to sort out details that
should be discussed within the Board or within the EC is deplorable. Look
at a