Link :
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections_2015/Results
--
Warm regards,
Ashwin Baindur
--
___
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubs
607/e6c1e259/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 12:57:36 +0530
> From: Ravishankar
> To: Wikimedia India Community list
>
> Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] Results of WMF Electi
Thanks for sharing the result.
I am not happy with this result for several reasons.
I was expecting one Indian this time -- it is of course a reason of my
unhappiness, but more importantly I think several things are unclear.
*Point 1: So many neutral votes?*
I hope I am not only one who is unhappy
Tito,
Feedback about elections can be posted at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections_2015/Post_mortem
Ravi
___
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing pr
Hi,
//Having least number of eligible voter among the community was a major
challenge to the Indic candidates. Mean time in future indic community
support is mostly important.//
We are missing the larger perspective here.
All three winning candidates and others who lost closely did not get those
Totally agree with Ravi.
We should groom more stewards and GAC/FDC members. That will help prepare a
potential candidate (for board elections) for greater roles within the
movement. It also will help build credibility.
All the best for those who plan to stand in 2017. You're acid test starts
now it
+1 Ravi
On 9 June 2015 at 19:03, Srikanth Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> Totally agree with Ravi.
> We should groom more stewards and GAC/FDC members. That will help prepare
> a potential candidate (for board elections) for greater roles within the
> movement. It also will help build credibility.
> All t
That would imply taking more responsibility in community and
international events both online & offline to develop the "biodata"
and become reasonably well known. On the other hand, English Wikipedia
initiatives finds lack of volunteers.
If anyone wants my vote, I'd like to see some online action.
On 13 June 2015 at 06:47, Ashwin Baindur wrote:
> I'm not
> going to vote for anyone just because he is Indian
>
That makes sense perfectly.
However we should also work to organize people (1.2 billions' country,
million articles), and we face difficulties to get people.
___
Just an add to Ashwin; not only English Wikipedia; any Indian language
Wikipedia or it sister projects IMO. I totally agree with Srikanth and Ravi
as well. Two years of hard both domestically and internationally work might
help.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Tito Dutta wrote:
>
> On 13 June 2
10 matches
Mail list logo
