I'm quite sure that browser addons can inject Ads into https, if they
want to. so https is not the answer to this problem. do you have
evidence otherwise?
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Sumana Harihareswara
suma...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Anirudh Bhati wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM,
John,
I've seen some differences in https vs https, namely:
* The ads, I haven't seen them on https, but only on http.
* Blocking Wikipedia/Commons, https is difficult to block.
I suggest everyone start using https.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:00 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm
Anirudh Bhati wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Debanjan Bandyopadhyay debast...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok then can we not make the default version the https one like say google
does.
This will not be a permanent solution, I'm afraid.
Encrypting your browser traffic does quite durably
