Nice. :-) Was this spontaneous on their part, or was there behind-the-scenes
discussions here?
Thanks,
Mike
On 29 Mar 2012, at 18:33, Chris Keating wrote:
> Oh, don't worry, we do! And we're not alone - many of the digital staff
> working in various institutions are very open to this, as are
Roger, Fae and I attended the Chapters conference over the last three
days and between us covered most of the sessions and, I hope, offered
a supportive and positive impression of the UK chapter.
There were lots of debates with the fundraising issues to the
forefront. With luck we can all m
On Monday, 2 April 2012 at 08:54, Gordon Joly wrote:
> Also - "Wikimedia Commons" vs "Archives for All" - where should you
> lodge copies of your data?
Both, and more. Archiving today is a distribution problem, not a trust problem.
Make it copyleft/PD, make it easily moveable, let people repl
Agree
On Monday, 2 April 2012, Gordon Joly wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 12:28, WereSpielChequers wrote:
>>
>> On a broader note I would suggest that the UK prioritise longterm
funding streams - payroll giving, and annual direct debits which may have a
lower attrition rate than monthly direct debits. Lo
On 01/04/2012 12:28, WereSpielChequers wrote:
On a broader note I would suggest that the UK prioritise longterm
funding streams - payroll giving, and annual direct debits which may
have a lower attrition rate than monthly direct debits. Longer term we
should think about legacies. One of the f
Selected images taken from Friday's workshop run with the Geological
Society are now on Commons:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:WMUK_workshop_2012-03-30
Charles
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia
