Staff capacity is /an/ issue. With the benefits of collaboration on wiki in
drafting applications, bid writing needn't be staff led but staff supported
(you guys write the pitch, I support it with numbers/details where
possible).
The challenge is that good funding bids do require quite a lot of wo
On 23 May 2013 14:53, Jon Davies wrote:
> Google have a grants system (go back to the start of the string) Of course
> we could try and get more page hits ...:)
Yes, some cross-purposes here. https://globalimpactchallenge.withgoogle.com/
and http://www.google.co.uk/grants/ .
Charles
r
>> >>> any such matters or their consequences. Communication with us by email
>> >>> will
>> >>> be taken as acceptance of the risks inherent in doing so.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>
t;> >>> for
>> >>> any such matters or their consequences. Communication with us by email
>> >>> will
>> >>> be taken as acceptance of the risks inherent in doing so.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513.
> >>> Registered
> >>> Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A
> >>> 4LT.
> >>> United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
> >
On 23 May 2013 11:19, wrote:
> I would suggest that if people are serious about going for a substantial
> slice of funding, then they work up the idea and then see if the concensus
> of the community is ready to back them. At that stage, it will then be a
> matter of finding funders interested i
t;>> Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
>>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>>&g
We didn't apply this time but thanks for the offer. We probably need to be
more nimble next time.
On 23 May 2013 10:23, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> I hadn't heard that we were applying, but I've made a successful
> application in the past, so happy to assist with future bids.
> On May 23, 2013 8:54 AM
I hadn't heard that we were applying, but I've made a successful
application in the past, so happy to assist with future bids.
On May 23, 2013 8:54 AM, "Jon Davies" wrote:
> (Certainly something we should consider f they do it again JD)
>
>
(Certainly something we should consider f they do it again JD)
We were blown away by the thoughtfulness and innovation in the hundreds of
fantastic submissions we received. We unfortunately had to make some tough
decisions in narrowing down
10 matches
Mail list logo
