Until last year the venue had always alternated between London and
not-London. It seems to me, therefore, that not-London is a priority for
this year.
On 18 March 2016 at 11:53, Lucy Crompton-Reid <
lucy.crompton-r...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I have previously emailed regarding
On 18/03/16 16:28, James Farrar wrote:
> Until last year the venue had always alternated between London and
> not-London. It seems to me, therefore, that not-London is a priority for
> this year.
What is the Universe of Discourse here?
Gordo
___
On 16 March 2016 at 15:31, WereSpielChequers
wrote:
>
> Are the other parameters the same?
No - but you've given me the idea to make a wrapper template that can
be SUBST: to do some of the conversions. I'll look at doing so
tomorrow or Friday (or Saturday...)
--
On 18 March 2016 at 11:53, Lucy Crompton-Reid
wrote:
> Also, please do let me know if you'd be interested in helping to shape the
> day as a volunteer!
I'd be happy to. As I live in Birmingham, I can also help you find a
venue, if you decide to come here.
But there is a precedent for moving the London meetup to the first weekend in
July:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meetup/London/35
--
Rexx
> On 19 March 2016 at 09:04 WereSpielChequers
> wrote:
>
>
> I agree with the logic of rotating between London and
Hi Andy,
Are the other parameters the same?
Regards
Jonathan
> On 16 Mar 2016, at 14:50, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
> If anyone fancies a job, there are 513 transclusions of:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_UK_feature
>
> listed at:
>
>
>
Dear all
I have previously emailed regarding this year's AGM for Wikimedia UK, which
will be taking place on Saturday 9th July. This is the point where new
board members can stand for election and where members of the charity have
the opportunity to express their views, raise ideas or discuss
I agree with the logic of rotating between London and elsewhere. However,
if you hold the AGM on the same weekend as the London meetup it would be
sensible to hold it in the same city.
On 18 March 2016 at 16:28, James Farrar wrote:
> Until last year the venue had always